Columbia Machine Question
-
billbossus
- Victor I
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 2:25 pm
Columbia Machine Question
I have an opportunity to purchase this machine. So before I travel to examine it, I'd like to know if this is an actual Columbia phonograph or fantasy. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you
- drh
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1484
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 12:24 pm
- Personal Text: A Pathé record...with care will live to speak to your grandchildren when they are as old as you are
- Location: Silver Spring, MD
Re: Columbia Machine Question
After consulting the Baumbach book to double check, I'm pretty sure it's a fake. No machine there had glass sides. The back bracket looks wrong. If the crank is actually engaged with the winding shaft, that can't be right for any genuine machine. Etc., etc.
- epigramophone
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 5790
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:21 pm
- Personal Text: An analogue relic trapped in a digital world.
- Location: The Somerset Levels, UK.
Re: Columbia Machine Question
No Columbia of this period would have had a tapering gooseneck tonearm, for which Victor held the patent.
- jamiegramo
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1068
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:52 am
- Location: St. Albans, UK
-
billbossus
- Victor I
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 2:25 pm
Re: Columbia Machine Question
Thanks alot gentlemen.
-
billbossus
- Victor I
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 2:25 pm
Re: Columbia Machine Question
Thanks alot gentlemen.
-
JerryVan
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 6836
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 pm
- Location: Southeast MI
Re: Columbia Machine Question
It's a made-up thing. However, I am very curious about the black base piece of the cabinet. It very much resembles an accessory base for a Columbia Q. If it were to be one of those, and if it were an original piece, it could be fairly valuable.
EDIT: Upon looking up an image of such a base, it does not match the shape of the one in this example. Oh well...
EDIT: Upon looking up an image of such a base, it does not match the shape of the one in this example. Oh well...
-
edisonplayer
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1827
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:33 pm
Re: Columbia Machine Question
It's definitely a FAKE!! edisonplayer.
- jamiegramo
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1068
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:52 am
- Location: St. Albans, UK
Re: Columbia Machine Question
Interesting I wondered the same as the base looks very similar to the bottom of the French Le Menestrel phonograph. I think it’s likely to be a sewing machine base.JerryVan wrote: Sat Feb 14, 2026 8:29 am It's a made-up thing. However, I am very curious about the black base piece of the cabinet. It very much resembles an accessory base for a Columbia Q. If it were to be one of those, and if it were an original piece, it could be fairly valuable.
EDIT: Upon looking up an image of such a base, it does not match the shape of the one in this example. Oh well...
Jamie
-
JerryVan
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 6836
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 pm
- Location: Southeast MI
Re: Columbia Machine Question
Excellent thought!jamiegramo wrote: Sat Feb 14, 2026 1:38 pmInteresting I wondered the same as the base looks very similar to the bottom of the French Le Menestrel phonograph. I think it’s likely to be a sewing machine base.JerryVan wrote: Sat Feb 14, 2026 8:29 am It's a made-up thing. However, I am very curious about the black base piece of the cabinet. It very much resembles an accessory base for a Columbia Q. If it were to be one of those, and if it were an original piece, it could be fairly valuable.
EDIT: Upon looking up an image of such a base, it does not match the shape of the one in this example. Oh well...