Yeah, you've got the older one, I assume. The new one is pretty thorough, I must say and says flat out that the old discography "took some liberties" by assuming names like that. As far as I've read, there haven't been any copies of catalogs or ads that have surfaced actually naming the "band", but that's moot. Since the recording studios were in New York City, they certainly could have used about anyone and would have had lots of choices. This leads me to wonder as well if they used musicians from other "bands" that may have otherwise had exclusive contracts with Edison, Victor or Columbia. I'm just speculating, but either way I highly recommend the new volume, it's fascinating reading! It also finally lays to rest a "mystery" regarding their special reproducer, which in original ad reprints clearly states it used a sapphire stylus, remember that?gramophoneshane wrote:My Indestructible reference lists the "Indestructible Military Band" as the artist on 1431, whoever they were
Sean