No way! This is mahogany, or I'm turning in my XI.gramophoneshane wrote: Hard to say if it's oak or mahogany too, but I'm leaning towards oak.

No way! This is mahogany, or I'm turning in my XI.gramophoneshane wrote: Hard to say if it's oak or mahogany too, but I'm leaning towards oak.
I wasn't too sure. The colour was right for an oak 104, though I couldn't really make out too much that looked like oak grain except for the top of the left side & the left front upright, but then all the spots where the finish has worn off looks much more like oak than mahogany to me.Henry wrote:No way! This is mahogany, or I'm turning in my XI.gramophoneshane wrote: Hard to say if it's oak or mahogany too, but I'm leaning towards oak.
JerryVan wrote:As to the criticism about its sound quality, who cares? I don't pretend that any of these phonographs have spectacular sound. Yes, large Orthophonics are nice and do sound good, but, it's like Model T Ford drivers discussing how fast their car is.