Restoration preference poll

Share your phonograph repair & restoration techniques here
User avatar
Brad
Victor III
Posts: 939
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:12 pm
Personal Text: So many phonographs, so little money
Location: The Garden State

Re: Restoration preference poll

Post by Brad »

(a little late to the party),

Scratches and gouges are part of the patina and tell a story, if you can't easily hide them, celebrate them.

Otherwise, I agree with the majority here, unless the finish is too far gone that you can't show the piece, clean it up, be creative in hiding some of the blemishes, and show your enthusiasm for the hobby when you demonstrate your machines. Your guests will be impressed.
Why do we need signatures when we are on a first avatar basis?

Jerry B.
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8756
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:25 am
Personal Text: Stop for a visit when in Oregon.
Location: Albany, Oregon

Re: Restoration preference poll

Post by Jerry B. »

I only refinish when it is absolutely necessary. An item is only original one time so the item must have a damaged finish to the point that it is a detraction or you feel like to must make an apology for its appearance. Trust your instincts and error on the side of originality.

I once had a visitor that suggested how nice my Amberola 1A would look if it were refinished. I was insulted to the point that I almost showed him to the door. My Amberola has its original dark fumed oak finish and it's in good shape. He must have felt that all oak machines should be golden oak. Don't ever fall for that. That same dark oak Amberola is my favorite Edison and it will be the last cylinder machine that I ever sell.

Jerry Blais

User avatar
m0xiemama
Victor II
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:56 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Restoration preference poll

Post by m0xiemama »

This is the progress I have made so far with just steel wool, Goop, Restore a finish and Feed and wax. The hardware store colsed before I could get the wax filler.
Attachments
I guess it isn't too bad considering where it started
I guess it isn't too bad considering where it started
Here is how it started.
Here is how it started.

User avatar
FloridaClay
Victor VI
Posts: 3708
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:14 pm
Location: Merritt Island, FL

Re: Restoration preference poll

Post by FloridaClay »

m0xiemama wrote:This is the progress I have made so far with just steel wool, Goop, Restore a finish and Feed and wax. The hardware store colsed before I could get the wax filler.
Amazing how far up it came!

Clay
Arthur W. J. G. Ord-Hume's Laws of Collecting
1. Space will expand to accommodate an infinite number of possessions, regardless of their size.
2. Shortage of finance, however dire, will never prevent the acquisition of a desired object, however improbable its cost.

User avatar
FloridaClay
Victor VI
Posts: 3708
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:14 pm
Location: Merritt Island, FL

Re: Restoration preference poll

Post by FloridaClay »

Jerry B. wrote:I once had a visitor that suggested how nice my Amberola 1A would look if it were refinished. I was insulted to the point that I almost showed him to the door. My Amberola has its original dark fumed oak finish and it's in good shape. He must have felt that all oak machines should be golden oak. Don't ever fall for that. That same dark oak Amberola is my favorite Edison and it will be the last cylinder machine that I ever sell.

Jerry Blais
There is an Amberola 1A on eBay for $4,995 right now where the fumed oak finish has been turned into golden oak on the outside. Unfortunate.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Edison-Amberola ... 2c63aceb17

Clay
Attachments
$(KGrHqVHJBME9!Hdm5rFBPWlqWqLfQ~~60_12.jpg
$(KGrHqVHJBME9!Hdm5rFBPWlqWqLfQ~~60_12.jpg (175.81 KiB) Viewed 1684 times
Arthur W. J. G. Ord-Hume's Laws of Collecting
1. Space will expand to accommodate an infinite number of possessions, regardless of their size.
2. Shortage of finance, however dire, will never prevent the acquisition of a desired object, however improbable its cost.

User avatar
m0xiemama
Victor II
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:56 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Restoration preference poll

Post by m0xiemama »

I saw that listing. What a shame.

Hey another question, if anyone is following this still. What is a good way to get paint off my cabinets? Seems a couple of them have splatters. I don't want to do anything too abrasive. So far I have just been using my fingernail

User avatar
scullylathe
Victor I
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:50 am
Location: Tennessee, USA

Re: Restoration preference poll

Post by scullylathe »

My take on finish restoration is if it's presentable or if you know it's original and can revive it with some light treatment of some kind, do it that way. If it's NOT presentable - that is, it would look like an old piece of junk sitting in the house - then restore the piece, but do your homework and find out what the original finish was (it may have already been refinished in the '60's or '70's so it "looks old", but isn't) and do it as close to the original as possible. I too shudder at that Amberola 1A...

estott
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4176
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:23 pm
Personal Text: I have good days...this might not be one of them
Location: Albany NY

Re: Restoration preference poll

Post by estott »

m0xiemama wrote:I saw that listing. What a shame.

Hey another question, if anyone is following this still. What is a good way to get paint off my cabinets? Seems a couple of them have splatters. I don't want to do anything too abrasive. So far I have just been using my fingernail
The fingernail method is good. You can also cautiously try Goof off- it is good at removing latex paint.

User avatar
barnettrp21122
Victor IV
Posts: 1615
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:19 pm
Personal Text: "Did you ever stop to think that pleasure is a duty?" (Victor sales pamphlet)

Re: Restoration preference poll

Post by barnettrp21122 »

estott wrote:
m0xiemama wrote:I saw that listing. What a shame.

Hey another question, if anyone is following this still. What is a good way to get paint off my cabinets? Seems a couple of them have splatters. I don't want to do anything too abrasive. So far I have just been using my fingernail
The fingernail method is good. You can also cautiously try Goof off- it is good at removing latex paint.
I'd recommend "Goo-Gone" over "Goof-Off" for paint spatter removal. In my experience it's less likely to dissolve any surface finish. It smells nicer too!
Bob
"Comparison is the thief of joy" Theodore Roosevelt

His Master's Voice Automatic 1A Exponential Gramophone Demonstration:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qi70G1Rzqpo

HisMastersVoice
Auxetophone
Posts: 2587
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:01 am

Re: Restoration preference poll

Post by HisMastersVoice »

barnettrp21122 wrote:I'd recommend "Goo-Gone" over "Goof-Off" for paint spatter removal. In my experience it's less likely to dissolve any surface finish. It smells nicer too!
Bob
One little note about Goo-Gone and related products (GoJo, Mineral Spirits, etc): I recently discovered that if you use Goo-Gone, or anything containing petroleum distillates near a pilot flame (my 1942 Roper stove has 3 giant pilots) your house will begin to smell like burning kerosene, as if you were using a kerosene heater. I couldn't figure out what was going on. After having the gas company come out, I learned that the pilot flame will start consuming the petroleum vapors and it smells like kerosene or diesel as it's being burned off and the smell can last for days if the house is closed up! No more Goo-Gone in the kitchen for me.

Post Reply