Thank you, Moxie. It was one of my better $50.00 investments... especially when I found out it pre-dated Brunswick production model numbers.m0xiemama wrote:Looks lovely, Tink. Brunswicks really do have nice style.

Thank you, Moxie. It was one of my better $50.00 investments... especially when I found out it pre-dated Brunswick production model numbers.m0xiemama wrote:Looks lovely, Tink. Brunswicks really do have nice style.
Hi Ed ~EFearing wrote:Tink, Love this Brunswick! I'm a sucker for the big ornate cabinets. I have several Brunswick models, all of which I love, even the sound to me is better than a Victrola. Brunswick Collender Co made some of the most beautiful cabinetry in the early 20th Cent. There is a picture of your phono in Tim and George's book PHONOGRAPHICA, page 137. It is a reprint of a Brunswick catalog of 1918. Your model is the third step down from their most elite model the "1500", costing ( imagine that) $1500.00
Yours is style 275 the next style was 225, priced accordingly, the only difference being the grill. Just thought you might like to know about this in case you didn't!?. Ed
Hi Tinkerbell,Tinkerbell wrote:Hi Ed ~EFearing wrote:Tink, Love this Brunswick! I'm a sucker for the big ornate cabinets. I have several Brunswick models, all of which I love, even the sound to me is better than a Victrola. Brunswick Collender Co made some of the most beautiful cabinetry in the early 20th Cent. There is a picture of your phono in Tim and George's book PHONOGRAPHICA, page 137. It is a reprint of a Brunswick catalog of 1918. Your model is the third step down from their most elite model the "1500", costing ( imagine that) $1500.00
Yours is style 275 the next style was 225, priced accordingly, the only difference being the grill. Just thought you might like to know about this in case you didn't!?. Ed
Thank you for your lovely comments.
Actually, after some rather extensive research (and with the help of Mr. R. Wakeman), I learned that my particular Brunswick was manufactured in 1916 prior to model numbers being issued. It has no actual model badge, and had a tonearm which held two, separate reproducers.
Hi Jan ~phonogal wrote: Have you been able to contact Mr. Wakeman about his book? Jan
Tinkerbell, It's really interesting to see the progression of the machines. Your pre badge model is earlier than mine as mine has the oval horn and newer lid decal. I found a patent date of 1918 on the lid support hardware of mine so mine may have had the Ultonia reproducer from the start. Jan.Tinkerbell wrote:Hi Jan ~phonogal wrote: Have you been able to contact Mr. Wakeman about his book? Jan
I, too, love the sound of my old Brunswick. It also has a wood motorboard, and a rectangular horn (rather than the oval). I replaced the original tonearm and reproducers with the brass Ultona because the original equipment was pot metal and deteriorating. They have been with Walt Sommers who is attempting to restore them.
I have not yet approached Mr. Wakeman; I have been attempting to draft a letter to make my proposal, and wish to word it in such a way that he would view the idea favorably. If you have any input or suggestions in this regard, they are certainly most welcome.
Thank you, George. The decal is certainly different than the one we typically see on this era of Brunswick.phonogfp wrote:That really is a nice Brunswick, Tink. I especially like the decal!
George P.