What is considered a Trade Mark Machine

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Post Reply
User avatar
pappde
Victor O
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:36 pm

What is considered a Trade Mark Machine

Post by pappde »

Just before this year is over I would love to have a nice lovely discussion to sign off 2012 :pig:
When it comes to Berliner gramophones, what would you consider as a Trademark Machine?
The purist definition is the easiest, i.e. the machine Barraud received from Owen and painted; a machine with the second type side brake (the lever kind), a brass horn and a "Gramophone Company 31 Maiden Lane" transfer (but manufactured in the US).
The "non" purist definition is much more difficult.
Would you include the "swing"brake earlier or the bolt brake later model?
What about the different horns?
Canadian, European?
:D

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: What is considered a Trade Mark Machine

Post by gramophone78 »

You may want to revisit your past thread on this...."Berliner Versions". There are also threads on Berliner reproducers, horns and record nuts that show and discuss this in great detail.
Hope this helps.

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8005
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: What is considered a Trade Mark Machine

Post by phonogfp »

Since the "Trade Mark" term is latter-day collectors' nomenclature, I'd expect both your "purist" and "non-purist" definitions would be popular. For myself, I'd simplify it to any Berliner "Improved Gramophone" (the term used at the time) using the original U.S. type motor/exposed spring cage machine, whether assembled in the U.S. or Europe; side-brake or top brake; with any belled Berliner horn.

I'm not as comfortable using the "Trade Mark" term for machines with spring cages that differ from the original design, either European or Canadian. That's just one collector's perspective... ;)

George P.

Starkton
Victor IV
Posts: 1116
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:00 am

Re: What is considered a Trade Mark Machine

Post by Starkton »

phonogfp wrote:For myself, I'd simplify it to any Berliner "Improved Gramophone" (the term used at the time) using the original U.S. type motor/exposed spring cage machine, whether assembled in the U.S. or Europe; side-brake or top brake; with any belled Berliner horn.
George P.
George, I expected this well-balanced opinion from you, and I applaud it.

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: What is considered a Trade Mark Machine

Post by gramophone78 »

George, I agree also on your comment. However, I must add I have not found a Berliner (Gramophone) I didn't like. Improved or not.... ;).

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8005
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: What is considered a Trade Mark Machine

Post by phonogfp »

gramophone78 wrote:George, I agree also on your comment. However, I must add I have not found a Berliner (Gramophone) I didn't like. Improved or not.... ;).
Agreed - - any Berliner (Gramophone) is a good Berliner! :)

George P.
Starkton wrote: George, I expected this well-balanced opinion from you, and I applaud it.
You're very kind. Like a broken clock, I get it right twice a day - - I must have gotten lucky this time! Thanks Stephan - -

George P.

Post Reply