I've never seen this mis-label. 30001 is a 40-minute record, yet this copy has the 24-minute label on it. My copy of 30001 has the correct 40-minute label. Has anyone else observed this?
Edison LP misprint?
- coyote
- Victor II
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:41 am
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
- Contact:
-
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 8716
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:25 am
- Personal Text: Stop for a visit when in Oregon.
- Location: Albany, Oregon
Re: Edison LP misprint?
Because it's faulty, I'd be happy to buy it from you. (cool record & mistake) Jerry B.
- coyote
- Victor II
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:41 am
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
- Contact:
Re: Edison LP misprint?
Not mine; mine is correct. eBay Item #321064238042
-
- Victor V
- Posts: 2708
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;
Re: Edison LP misprint?
I have always been kinda fascinated by Edison's Long Play system. I heard he only released a couple titles? Were there alot of LP titles available? Edison in someways was very advanced for his time.
- ImperialGuardsman
- Victor II
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:01 pm
- Personal Text: Nothing like blaring Caruso out of your college dorm window...
- Location: Oregon
Re: Edison LP misprint?
From my understanding, there were very few titles. Along with that, they were all dubs, had low volume, and the thin groove walls broke down quickly.Victrolacollector wrote:I have always been kinda fascinated by Edison's Long Play system. I heard he only released a couple titles? Were there alot of LP titles available? Edison in someways was very advanced for his time.
I wonder if it would have worked if another stringer material had been used, along with direct recording rather than dubs (so that they would sound good while also working).
ImperialGuardsman
OTAPS (Oregon Territory Antique Phonograph Society) Member
~Also a member of Suscipe Domine and The High Road forums~
OTAPS (Oregon Territory Antique Phonograph Society) Member
~Also a member of Suscipe Domine and The High Road forums~
- Lucius1958
- Victor Monarch
- Posts: 4036
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:17 am
- Location: Where there's "hamburger ALL OVER the highway"...
Re: Edison LP misprint?
From what i read in Frow, they had so many technical difficulties in cutting these, they couldn't manage direct recording, and had to resort to dubbing...ImperialGuardsman wrote:From my understanding, there were very few titles. Along with that, they were all dubs, had low volume, and the thin groove walls broke down quickly.Victrolacollector wrote:I have always been kinda fascinated by Edison's Long Play system. I heard he only released a couple titles? Were there alot of LP titles available? Edison in someways was very advanced for his time.
I wonder if it would have worked if another stringer material had been used, along with direct recording rather than dubs (so that they would sound good while also working).
Bill
-
- Victor II
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 7:43 am
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Edison LP misprint?
The Edison Long Playing records are certainly fascinating and a tremendous technical achievement for their day. The main problem with them, apart from the fragility of the groove walls (although I believe both Frow and Gelatt overstate this as with a decent stylus and a bit of care, they will play satisfactorily), was the actual music recorded. The adverising puff from the Edison company at the time suggested that there would be complete acts from operas and whole movements from symphonies but unfortunately these never matrialised and instead one got the usual standard Edison fare of selections seemingly chosen at random.
The only record to really exploit the 20 minute playing time was 30004 with the complete Nutcracker Suite on one side, although it is dubbed from Edison standard discs and yes, you can hear the joins!
The actual sound is also very thin, especially so when compared to the contemporary electrical recording put out by other companies - imagine a dubbed Blue Amberol but with only half the volume and that is pretty much the sound on the discs. By far the best recordings are the first two 10 inch issues, 10001 and 10002, which were dubbed from specially recorded masters, other than that the recordings are pretty ropey.
I don't have any sales figures but Frow suggests they were a financial disaster and the fact that only 14 were ever issued tends to support that view, although the records do turn up every now and again even in the UK.
Despite all their manifest flaws, I find the Edison Long Playing records to be fascinating and frequently just sit down and listen to one, marvelling at the technical brilliance but sad that such an opportunity to record decent music without a side break in 1926/1927 was sadly missed.
Tim W-W
The only record to really exploit the 20 minute playing time was 30004 with the complete Nutcracker Suite on one side, although it is dubbed from Edison standard discs and yes, you can hear the joins!
The actual sound is also very thin, especially so when compared to the contemporary electrical recording put out by other companies - imagine a dubbed Blue Amberol but with only half the volume and that is pretty much the sound on the discs. By far the best recordings are the first two 10 inch issues, 10001 and 10002, which were dubbed from specially recorded masters, other than that the recordings are pretty ropey.
I don't have any sales figures but Frow suggests they were a financial disaster and the fact that only 14 were ever issued tends to support that view, although the records do turn up every now and again even in the UK.
Despite all their manifest flaws, I find the Edison Long Playing records to be fascinating and frequently just sit down and listen to one, marvelling at the technical brilliance but sad that such an opportunity to record decent music without a side break in 1926/1927 was sadly missed.
Tim W-W
- pughphonos
- Victor III
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:35 pm
- Personal Text: Ms. Pugh
- Location: Homewood, Illinois, USA
Re: Edison LP misprint?
Just thought I'd let you and other Edison Long Play enthusiasts know that I'm about to join your ranks. Have found most of the needed hardware with George Vollema and hope to be up and playing in a couple weeks (upgrading my Edison S-19). Then I can try to chase down the records in the months ahead.
I've read all the cautionary tales about thin groove walls, soft volume, pedestrian material, etc. None of that spooks me. I'm just prepared to be amazed to hear an antique phonograph play for longer than four minutes.
Oh, BTW, I've already upgraded the S-19 to a double spring, so no deficiency there.
Ralph
I've read all the cautionary tales about thin groove walls, soft volume, pedestrian material, etc. None of that spooks me. I'm just prepared to be amazed to hear an antique phonograph play for longer than four minutes.

Oh, BTW, I've already upgraded the S-19 to a double spring, so no deficiency there.
Ralph
"You must serve music, because music is so enormous and can envelop you into such a state of perpetual anxiety and torture--but it is our first and main duty"
-- Maria Callas, 1968 interview.
-- Maria Callas, 1968 interview.
-
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 8716
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:25 am
- Personal Text: Stop for a visit when in Oregon.
- Location: Albany, Oregon
Re: Edison LP misprint?
Would you record folks recommend playing an Edison LP on a Diamond Disk or is there a better method? Jerry
- VintageTechnologies
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:09 pm
Re: Edison LP misprint?
I have one mint 12" specimen that I wanted to hear, so once I played it on a modern turnable with cross-wired stereo cartridge tracking as light as possible, probably at 1 gram. If I wanted to hear an LP on an original machine, I would buy a record in lesser condition and keep my mint record mint.Jerry B. wrote:Would you record folks recommend playing an Edison LP on a Diamond Disk or is there a better method? Jerry