Columbia Q reproducer

Share your phonograph repair & restoration techniques here
zapper
Victor II
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 2:21 pm
Location: UK

Columbia Q reproducer

Post by zapper »

I have recently purchased a first style Graphophone Q with a #3 reproducer. The stylus bar has become detached from the diaphragm. Can anyone help by telling me the correct method of fixing it back together. Should I use glue or wax?

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8005
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Columbia Q reproducer

Post by phonogfp »

If you want to be authentic, use a drop of shellac. I've also used "super glue" with excellent results: removal is done by gently twisting, but then it needs to be cleaned with acetone (finger nail polish remover).

George P.

zapper
Victor II
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 2:21 pm
Location: UK

Re: Columbia Q reproducer

Post by zapper »

Hi George
Thank you for the reply. I have just unpacked the Q and noticed that the diaphragm is aluminium. I have checked in Howard Hazelcorn book which suggests this is correct. Can I still use Shellac to bond the stylus bar to the aluminium diaphragm?
Regards

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8005
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Columbia Q reproducer

Post by phonogfp »

zapper wrote:Hi George
Thank you for the reply. I have just unpacked the Q and noticed that the diaphragm is aluminium. I have checked in Howard Hazelcorn book which suggests this is correct. Can I still use Shellac to bond the stylus bar to the aluminium diaphragm?
Regards
The "aluminum" referred to in the book is what the reproducer body is made from. The diaphragm in a #3 reproducer was originally glass, but mica is an acceptable substitute. These diaphragms are readily available from the major suppliers listed in the main menu.

That said, shellac would probably bond the stylus bar and aluminum diaphragm. Before you do anything with that aluminum diaphragm, could you either post a photo of it, or describe it? There were period aluminium replacements but they seldom show up on Graphophone reproducers.

George P.

zapper
Victor II
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 2:21 pm
Location: UK

Re: Columbia Q reproducer

Post by zapper »

Hi George
The phonograph is stamped on the edge of the baseplate with the numbers 635591 if that helps identify its age and the aluminium diaphragm is quit shiny and perfectly round, which may suggest that it has not been cut to replace an earlier glass/mica disc. I have tried to take some close up photos, which hopefully will show the diaphragm in sufficient detail. Look forward to your thoughts and any suggestions regarding replacement mica suppliers.
Regards
Attachments
IMGP4687.JPG
IMGP4686.JPG

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8005
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Columbia Q reproducer

Post by phonogfp »

Well, it's not a Mobley or a Hawthorne & Sheble, but it doesn't look home-made either. If you choose to go the glass or mica route, I'd keep the aluminum one in an envelope.

I get my diaphragms from Ron Sitko, but most any of the parts suppliers can help you.

Good luck!

George P.

User avatar
Brad
Victor III
Posts: 939
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:12 pm
Personal Text: So many phonographs, so little money
Location: The Garden State

Re: Columbia Q reproducer

Post by Brad »

I can't identify the repro, but the diaphragm looks like mica to me. The reflected light in the first photo looks more like mica and the center where the stylse attaches looks like a layer or two of mica has lifted off. I don't think a thin piece of aluminum would exhibit those traits.

I wonder if the inside was painted silver to make it "look" aluminum?
Why do we need signatures when we are on a first avatar basis?

User avatar
Lucius1958
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4036
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:17 am
Location: Where there's "hamburger ALL OVER the highway"...

Re: Columbia Q reproducer

Post by Lucius1958 »

Brad wrote:I can't identify the repro, but the diaphragm looks like mica to me. The reflected light in the first photo looks more like mica and the center where the stylse attaches looks like a layer or two of mica has lifted off. I don't think a thin piece of aluminum would exhibit those traits.

I wonder if the inside was painted silver to make it "look" aluminum?
In the first photo, that's most likely residue of the old shellac.

Secondly, a quick touch test would tell whether it's mica or not; mica would feel scratchier, while aluminum would not.

Thirdly, why would anyone paint a mica diaphragm to look like aluminum - particularly when it's not usually visible?

Bill

User avatar
FloridaClay
Victor VI
Posts: 3708
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:14 pm
Location: Merritt Island, FL

Re: Columbia Q reproducer

Post by FloridaClay »

Looks like mica to me too.

Clay
Arthur W. J. G. Ord-Hume's Laws of Collecting
1. Space will expand to accommodate an infinite number of possessions, regardless of their size.
2. Shortage of finance, however dire, will never prevent the acquisition of a desired object, however improbable its cost.

zapper
Victor II
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 2:21 pm
Location: UK

Re: Columbia Q reproducer

Post by zapper »

Hi Thanks everybody for posting the replies. I have now cleaned the machine and assumed it is a mica diaphragm and played a Columiba brown cylinder on it. As most say the sound was not the best. I then tried a #7 from the 2nd style Q. This was much louder. So now my question is should I put some extra weight on the original reproducer to increase the sound or would this damage the cylinder. Also as George mentioned does anyone know the weight of the Mobley weight shown as an addition for this reproducer. Not likely to find one original or repro. If anyone can help it would be appreciated.
Regards

Post Reply