Do you buy both Edison Diamond Discs and Blue Amberols containing the same titles?
I personally have a couple that are on both formats, but trying to avoid doing it. I stick mostly to Diamond Discs, but try to get songs that were not released on disc on the Blue Amberols, and reproduction records which are hard to find on the 4 minute format.
Do you buy both Edison DD and Blue Amberols of same title?
-
- Victor V
- Posts: 2708
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;
- Lucius1958
- Victor Monarch
- Posts: 4036
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:17 am
- Location: Where there's "hamburger ALL OVER the highway"...
Re: Do you buy both Edison DD and Blue Amberols of same titl
If I have a dubbed BA of an interesting title, and I find a good copy of the DD - especially if it's a late transfer or a paper label - I'm likely to buy it for the better sound.
As for the 1916 -19 period, sometimes the dubbed versions can be more tolerable to listen to than the originals…
As an example of the first category: among my first batch of DDs was a copy of 'Music Box Rag', which was horribly split. As it is a good tune, when I found the BA in an auction list, I snapped it up. If I can find a really good original disc, I'll get that:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYj2m45Bp5U[/youtube]
Bill
As for the 1916 -19 period, sometimes the dubbed versions can be more tolerable to listen to than the originals…
As an example of the first category: among my first batch of DDs was a copy of 'Music Box Rag', which was horribly split. As it is a good tune, when I found the BA in an auction list, I snapped it up. If I can find a really good original disc, I'll get that:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYj2m45Bp5U[/youtube]
Bill
- coyote
- Victor II
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:41 am
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
- Contact:
Re: Do you buy both Edison DD and Blue Amberols of same titl
Very true. I'll occasionally look for both formats if I particularly like a tune. Dubbing quality varied widely, from abysmal to hardly detectable (almost as good as the direct recording, with very little "rumble" when the dub cuts in). Here's one example of a particularly bad dub:Lucius1958 wrote:As for the 1916 -19 period, sometimes the dubbed versions can be more tolerable to listen to than the originals…
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDZnd5DQ334[/youtube]