
http://bimg1.mlstatic.com/gramofone-de- ... 082013.jpg
http://bimg2.mlstatic.com/gramofone-de- ... 082013.jpg
http://bimg1.mlstatic.com/gramofone-de- ... 082013.jpg
Thank very much!

Sorry, Soundgen, but with respects, the 9000 doesn't have the circular plaque in the lid, that's the 206, which is identical, except that it doesn't have the chromium wings at the lid/base angle, has a different lid stay arrangement, and a 102 style turntable, with the straight edge, but covered in velvet instead of the usual felt.soundgen wrote:it is a Columbia Model 9000 equivalent to an HMV 102 , it should have a circular Columbia pad in the lid , I take it this must be missing for you to think it is an HMV machine ?
Sorry, Soundgen, but with respects, the 9000 doesn't have the circular plaque in the lid, that's the 206, which is identical, except that it doesn't have the chromium wings at the lid/base angle, has a different lid stay arrangement, and a 102 style turntable, with the straight edge, but covered in velvet instead of the usual felt.[/quotePhono48 wrote:soundgen wrote:it is a Columbia Model 9000 equivalent to an HMV 102 , it should have a circular Columbia pad in the lid , I take it this must be missing for you to think it is an HMV machine ?
soundgen wrote:it is a Columbia Model 9000 equivalent to an HMV 102 , it should have a circular Columbia pad in the lid , I take it this must be missing for you to think it is an HMV machine ?
Thank you! I just now understanding the connection between Columbia and HMV.estott wrote:At that point Columbia portables were nearly the same as HMV portables, so the confusion is understandable.
Thank you! I had never seen this model, then got confused.Phono48 wrote:Sorry, Soundgen, but with respects, the 9000 doesn't have the circular plaque in the lid, that's the 206, which is identical, except that it doesn't have the chromium wings at the lid/base angle, has a different lid stay arrangement, and a 102 style turntable, with the straight edge, but covered in velvet instead of the usual felt.soundgen wrote:it is a Columbia Model 9000 equivalent to an HMV 102 , it should have a circular Columbia pad in the lid , I take it this must be missing for you to think it is an HMV machine ?
In case you are not aware of their history, Columbia and HMV merged in 1931 to form EMI.dilhermandodidi wrote:Thank you! I just now understanding the connection between Columbia and HMV.estott wrote:At that point Columbia portables were nearly the same as HMV portables, so the confusion is understandable.