Original Phono literature?

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Post Reply
User avatar
Valecnik
Victor VI
Posts: 3871
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
Location: Česká Republika
Contact:

Original Phono literature?

Post by Valecnik »

Has anyone else noticed there seems to be an awful lot of "original" phonograph literature like this example recently showing up on eBAY in excellent condition? I'm not necessarily challenging the authenticity of this particular piece but there's almost no way to tell from a picture. Also, I know that there are nice reproductions available of the same pieces because I have a bunch of the repros...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Original-Edison ... 5af5fc6947

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8162
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Original Phono literature?

Post by phonogfp »

I've noticed it too, Bruce. That catalog was reproduced about 40 years ago, and there have been a lot of them around. Without a dealer imprint, I'd be highly suspicious. I'm afraid some unknowing collectors are being taken to the cleaners.

George P.

Slaton
Victor O
Posts: 67
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:32 pm
Location: Central Florida

Re: Original Phono literature?

Post by Slaton »

Bruce, I got one of those on eBay for 36 dollars. I assure you it wasn't original. It was a beautiful reproduction, though! When asked, the seller said it came from his fathers estate and thathe thought it was original, and he offered to take it back. Wasn't worth the effort so i kept it. Al Sefl noted on a different forum that an original sold for 12 dollars while the reproduction sold for 3 times as much!....

Anil

User avatar
Valecnik
Victor VI
Posts: 3871
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
Location: Česká Republika
Contact:

Re: Original Phono literature?

Post by Valecnik »

Anil, I thought so. I've seen several nice pieces advertised as original, all of which I have very nice reproductions of that look original. It seems plausible that some sellers really don't know in some cases. Others could just be choosing not to know. Most of mine say "reprinted by xxx" usually on one of the back pages of the document. Did yours say that or was there any indication that a page noting it was reprinted had been removed?

Anyway, many of these repros are very good quality and I suppose $20 or $30 is not an outrageous price to pay. I paid half that for some of them but that was 20 + years ago.

Moooperator
Victor I
Posts: 179
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:55 am

Re: Original Phono literature?

Post by Moooperator »

I have heard the images from the reproduction catalogs have halftone moiere patterns in them while the originals do not... it this a way to tell the difference? I know halftone printing goes back to the later 1800's.

User avatar
Silvertone
Victor II
Posts: 267
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 3:57 pm

Re: Original Phono literature?

Post by Silvertone »

I have the reprint of this catalog, and have to say it was really nicely done. The photos look good without any moiré patterns. Unfortunately, I don't have a original of this particular catalog to compare it to, but other original catalogs that I have seem to have sharper text and more uniform color. I think on casual inspection, most people would think this reprint was an original if they didn't know better.

Post Reply