Merely semantics, bud. That's doesn't "prove" anything.epigramophone wrote:
You are wrong, and here is the proof :

Merely semantics, bud. That's doesn't "prove" anything.epigramophone wrote:
You are wrong, and here is the proof :
Maybe UK vs US terminology?epigramophone wrote:You are wrong, and here is the proof :
In the UK, most records would have been supplied by the manufacturer in paper sleeves, but many dealers had their own (usually cardboard) sleeves printed for advertising purposes. Some were standard designs with spaces into which the dealer's details were inserted, whilst others were exclusive to a particular dealer.phono-smitten wrote:Maybe UK vs US terminology?epigramophone wrote:You are wrong, and here is the proof :
When 'bags' was mentioned I thought of the discs I found in actual bags and began to wonder about early record purchasing. What was the most common record packaging during the 78 era or trends through this period? Would most records have been prepackaged in individual sleeves or would one choose unsleeved records that would be placed in bags? Just curious about the etymology of terms.
I put all my discs in new sleeves and write info on them but save most of the old sleeves and keep them out in a box. I love the graphics and like to have the originals to leaf through.
There's a seemingly endless variety of these dealer sleeves around over here, so many that they're pretty much all unremarkable. Nearly every town and city had several shops selling records (and many other kinds of goods) over the years. Virtually none of them have survived - although some of us remember a few 20 or 30 years ago. One name near me happens to remain, but as a car dealer only.Kryptosmaster wrote:I found an interesting English HMV still in original seller's envelope sleeve. Any chance this place is still around?
Clck on thumbnail to enlarge.
Thought this would be of interest to the uk members.