Cheers enjoy your records and music
Dwight

Here Here! good approach!Henry wrote:My approach is: Exhibition, use soft steel needle (only once), play anything/any era but vinyl, sit back, enjoy.
I don't have any really valuable records. Most of what I paid was probably 10-15$ for a center start Pathé. Otherwise I mostly buy in boxes. I still only use a new soft tone steel needle for every play. I tried bamboo needles, but most of my records wear them out too quickly.edisonplayer wrote:What about playing valuable 78's on a vintage machine.I played a Victor scroll label by Jelly Roll Morton's band on my Credenza.When I play records like that on a wind up I always use a NEW steel needle.edisonplayer
Orchorsol wrote:I'd be interested to hear if some models were accurate - my understanding (and some limited experience) is that HMV machines' tracking is poor compared to that of e.g. EMGs and Experts.De Soto Frank wrote:Some of the British HMV machines from the 1930's are considered to have the best tracking geometry among acoustic phonographs.
These are the Columbia "plano-reflex" arms, but in the book, it's the HMV arms that have the bad tracking angles, with the early Decca portable having the best!De Soto Frank wrote: Uh-oh... I think I may have my British machines muddled.
The ones I'm thinking-of have the "flatted" elbows on the gooseneck of the tone-arm, and the diaphragm-plane of the sound-box is not perpendicular to the axis through the tone-arm mounting...
These are described in Eric Reiss's book... which I have loaned-out to a friend, so I can't look it up right now...
Phono48 wrote:These are the Columbia "plano-reflex" arms, but in the book, it's the HMV arms that have the bad tracking angles, with the early Decca portable having the best!De Soto Frank wrote: