24-minute Edison

Discussions on Records, Recording, & Artists
Post Reply
User avatar
Nat
Victor III
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 12:02 pm
Location: Edmonds, Washington

24-minute Edison

Post by Nat »

I just saw a twenty-four minute 78 rpm record on eBay. I am completely ignorant about Edisons - how was this done? And when? Fascinating stuff!

User avatar
Le0
Victor II
Posts: 284
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:28 pm
Personal Text: avid 22 years old collector
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: 24-minute Edison

Post by Le0 »

Nat wrote:I just saw a twenty-four minute 78 rpm record on eBay. I am completely ignorant about Edisons - how was this done? And when? Fascinating stuff!
it's an Edison Long Play. about 400 TPI and 80 RPM.
Machines I own: Edison Standard A, suitcase Home, Home A, Triumph A & B, Columbia type BS, Standard Model A, Victor E, IV & V, Pathéphone No.4

User avatar
VintageTechnologies
Victor IV
Posts: 1651
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:09 pm

Re: 24-minute Edison

Post by VintageTechnologies »

Nat wrote:I just saw a twenty-four minute 78 rpm record on eBay. I am completely ignorant about Edisons - how was this done? And when? Fascinating stuff!
The groove thread pitch was three times finer than the standard Edison Diamond Disk record -- 450 tpi versus 150 tpi. (As a comparison, modern LP vinyl records were cut about 200 tpi.) Therefore, even at 80 rpm, a 10 inch record played three times longer, i.e., 12 minutes average per side. The 12 inch records played even longer, at 20 minutes per side. The records were marketed in 1926 and were a commercial failure; the grooves were too fine to withstand a heavy acoustic reproducer, and soon the records would skip.

User avatar
Nat
Victor III
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 12:02 pm
Location: Edmonds, Washington

Re: 24-minute Edison

Post by Nat »

VintageTechnologies wrote:
Nat wrote:I just saw a twenty-four minute 78 rpm record on eBay. I am completely ignorant about Edisons - how was this done? And when? Fascinating stuff!
The groove thread pitch was three times finer than the standard Edison Diamond Disk record -- 450 tpi versus 150 tpi. (As a comparison, modern LP vinyl records were cut about 200 tpi.) Therefore, even at 80 rpm, a 10 inch record played three times longer, i.e., 12 minutes average per side. The 12 inch records played even longer, at 20 minutes per side. The records were marketed in 1926 and were a commercial failure; the grooves were too fine to withstand a heavy acoustic reproducer, and soon the records would skip.
A great idea, though. One of those where the idea was ahead of the ability do it properly. How did they sound?

User avatar
coyote
Victor II
Posts: 455
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:41 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: 24-minute Edison

Post by coyote »

All Edison Long Play records were dubbed, so the volume is lower than one would expect from, say, a later non-electrically recorded regular Diamond Disc (say, later 51000 series). There are a few videos on YouTube, but not many. Here are some snippets of a few, recorded directly from the horn of an Edison LP console. I intended to post some Edison Long Plays with better audio quality on YouTube, but life keeps getting in the way.

Egmont - Overture - Sodero's Band (10004-R)
004Redit.mp3
(2.57 MiB) Downloaded 83 times
Hello Bluebird - Kaplan's Melodists (10006-R)
006Redit.mp3
(2.82 MiB) Downloaded 78 times
Merry Widow Selections - B.A. Rolfe and His Palais D'Or Orchestra (not a skip, I edited from the opening directly to the waltz)
008Redit.mp3
(3.27 MiB) Downloaded 70 times
I'll request that this topic be re-directed to the "Music" section.

Post Reply