PeterF wrote:I don't sell on eBay too frequently, but know my way around pretty well. However a recent transaction taught me a few things in somewhat uncomfortable fashion, and I aim to save some of you fellow phonoists similar trouble by sharing a few tips gleaned from the experience. Here we go:
1. If you list something as "as-is, no returns" - which is especially important to the seller financially on stuff that is expensive to ship - eBay can still require you to accept it back if the buyer files what eBay considers to be a valid complaint about it. So you need to set about preventing the sort of complaints that will run against you in ebay's superficial eyes.
2. In my example, I sold a portable phono that was worn but usable. I'd made sure it ran perfectly when it left here, and described and showed it accurately, and listed it as "as-is, no returns." It sold for only a little more than the reproducer was worth, and shipped for about half the auction price, but whatever, I had cleared it out of here. But: I did not shoot video of it running.
3. The buyer was not a phono collector, nor was she mechanically inclined. Upon arrival she claimed it didn't work, and I went to great pains to help her get it working, through detailed instructions and questions. Long story short, there was nothing wrong with it and she simply had buyer's remorse and wanted to back out, on my nickel. She filed a claim with eBay, saying it didn't work. She also said it was well packed and undamaged...so an insurance claim could not be filed either. And eBay rubber stamped the claim as valid and required me to pay to ship it back, and removed her purchase and shipping payment from my paypal account. As-is, no returns held no weight whatsoever - eBay can unilaterally remove that element from your auctions, for no cause.
4. I knew that if she shipped it back I would likely get a box of firewood and scrap metal, and be out the additional shipping money to boot, so I declined the return. She keeps the machine, for free. And although I got eBay to request photographic proof of damage and/or non-function, she did not provide it and still "won" the claim. (After the resolution, I messaged her to give the thing to some local kid to tinker with, in case the kid could have fun trying to fix it. No response. Hope she's enjoying her free phono.)
So how do we prevent this sort of thing? Here is what I would suggest:
- If the item is sold as functional, shoot video of it on your phone, playing or otherwise working. You can retain that for possible use, or even better, just throw it up on YouTube and include that URL in the listing as an extra sales helper. This will remove the "he said it works, but it doesn't" claim.
- Develop some boilerplate wording for your listings that informs novice buyers that the thing is 100 years old (or whatever) and so not to expect modern day performance or cosmetics (unless condition is a selling point), in a friendly way. This removes the claim of "not working right" by people who are disappointed it doesn't sound as good as their Bluetooth iPhone speaker.
- Shoot pictures of the packing process, and of the final package, and hang onto them til the thing arrives safely and is accepted. This removes the potential claim that you packed it wrong and it broke in transit, and bolsters any potential insurance claim.
- Insure everything, and require buyers to pay for it, and clearly include that fact in your listing. If things go south, it's a fallback for you - admittedly iffy at times, but better than nothing.
- For mechanical items that might get out of alignment or otherwise mildly less-than-optimal, include an offer of post sale phone support. This can prevent issues from people who can't figure out how to place a turntable on a spindle, or thread a crank onto a shaft through a cabinet escutcheon or tighten a needle chuck or put a reproducer on a tone arm. There are way more people like that than we probably want to acknowledge, and a little patient guidance can save much acrimony later.
- This last one might be too much, but I will throw it in anyway. It struck me during the debugging attempt that the buyer might have been trying to play late vinyl 78s, or even vinyl LPs, on the thing. These would obviously not play on a 20's phono, dragging under the heavy tracking force, and in the case of the LPs, also never being able to be near the correct speed, and kicking out vinyl shavings, etc. My buyer reacted with anger at my asking this, because she knew all about such things - by virtue of her grandfather having once owned a victrola. (Such hereditary expertise transfer requires more extensive research, involving genomic blood testing and brain cat-scans of the offspring of Messrs. Paul and Rondeau, with my own kids as the control group.)
All right, I hope this helps at least some of us. Sadly, the eBay monopoly makes it hard to just walk away from the process, so these tips may help keep things easier if you want to sell. I do think I'm going to stop selling anything larger or more complex than an Edison Standard, because the risk and cost increases quite a bit after that.
Good luck.
Peter, the problem will all of this is that you as the seller can
still wind up getting the shaft. there have been documented instances of sellers having to pay return shipping on a "Not As Described" case because an item listed as "for parts or not working"...
did not work!
And yes, a buyer CAN send "anything" back in place of your item, and eBay will force the refund.
It's not that eBay favors buyers over sellers... it's actually that eBay favors eBay over everyone, but buyers just happen to reap the unintended benefits. Example: eBay buys a lot of buyer goodwill, but does it with money that is not theirs. It's like free advertising- and if the seller loses, eBay still gets to keep the fees, too. What's not to like if you're eBay? Let's face reality: Scammers make eBay money. Period.
You can do anything you want to try to protect yourself from these things, but there is only one
foolproof method to avoid getting scammed selling on the internet: Avoid eBay entirely, and do NOT accept PayPal for payment anyplace else.
Don't know if you are aware of it, but PayPal has a new policy that I call '180 Days Same As Free': the buyer has
six months to claim it's "not as described" or even that they never got it!
The second part is REALLY bad because the USPS, Fedex, and UPS only retain tracking numbers for 90 days. If your "buyer" claims they never got it on Day 179, you're not going to be able to provide
online viewable tracking from the carrier because it dropped out of the system at 90 days. Guess what PayPal decides in this case? Yup, they award the "buyer" the win because the seller can't provide proof of delivery.
No, they won't accept printouts, screen shots, shipper intranet evidence... Why? because they claim all of these can be faked (and unfortunately they are right).
We have found that is some instances, the USPS can and will reactivate a tracking number for a seller in these circumstances if the seller pleads his case with the local postmaster, but so far no word from FedEx or UPS on this.
It's a real mess.
Some of you may also be aware that eBay "spun off" PayPal last July and now they are "separate companies". I put that in quotes because those of us who follow this stuff know better. In the "split" agreement it's spelled out that eBay will pay a "fine" if PayPal usage drops below 80% in the next five years... and immediately after the split, eBay
banned all other electronic payment providers- Skrill, ProPay, etc. Now buyers are allowed to choose between paying by credit card directly or paying by PayPal.
However, the choice is only smoke and mirrors- the credit card gateway is Payflow, owned by...wait for it... PayPal.
So, here we have a "separate company" with what they wanted all along, and likely the real reason they are now "separate"... a de facto total monopoly on eBay.
What this means is that now an eBay seller is actually in triple jeopardy on every eBay sale. The buyer can file an eBay case, and, if they lose that, they can open the same case with PayPal. There have been many, many instances of PayPal finding for the buyer even when eBay backed the seller. If the buyer loses with both eBay and PayPal and they paid with a credit card... they can do a credit card chargeback.
What's funky about the CC chargeback with PayPal is that PayPal is the merchant of record, and they will "fight" it for you... but where I just shake my head and laugh is that PayPal can spend the payroll to fight and win on your behalf and they get
nothing for this... but if they lose, you agree to pay them an extra $20 for basically "throwing the fight". Hmm... Let's see... I am going to have to pay payroll out of my own pocket to fight for my customer... or I can just not bother and make a quick 20. Gee, wonder what I'ma gonna do....
Sorry this is so long and reads like Chicken Little... but these are the facts with eBay/ PayPal these days. I think you need to know.
I loved eBay back when it was a venue and not a "managed marketplace", and I've been with PayPal since the beginning. They were great when they were "services", but once they started to feel entitled and they wanted to look at what's mine as theirs I couldn't shut down selling on eBay fast enough.
It wasn't until eBay bought PayPal that the "community" became "sellers v. buyers"... and that was all so eBay could force PayPal and double dip on every sale "for our own good".
It's a shame, but with eBay,
everything they do is nothing but a money grab.