JeffR1 wrote: Wed Apr 06, 2022 3:43 am
*forcing the grease in the rest of the spring is key, this allows the grease to spread evenly and makes for a quiet spring; this is what I have learned for myself.
*Here is what I believe what is wrong with Vaseline and Graphite, and I think this is what Edison has used on the C19 _ the Chippendale model ?
It separates into an oil and lumps of hard graphite, the graphite ends up in the cavities in the spring barrel and all that's left to lubricate the spring is just the oil.
*I'm glad my suggestion to actually pack the barrel with grease, instead of smearing a thin layer of it along the length of the spring, worked.
Bravo.
*Actually, as far as I'm aware, Edison DID NOT use vaseline and graphite mix on springs, but Victor/HMV did, or at least they used some sort of graphite grease, which after 50 yrs tends to harden.
Now whether it was vaseline or not I can't say either way because I'm certainly no lubricant expert, I've never had the original grease scientifically annolised, and I've never seen any original literature that states the grease is vaseline, so I'm probably a little sceptical where vaseline is concerned.
And even if it was, we don't know if in 1915 the vaseline was the same consistently as today.
I'm also sceptical about this 50/50 mix.
I think common sense would tell you that adding equal part of what's basically a powder to vaseline is going to give you some pretty awful thick concoction that won't be happy in a spring barrel.
I'd actually love to know where and when this 50/50 came from.
I'd never heard of it until I got my first computer in about 2002, and I discovered phono forums.
I kind of find it hard to believe Edison or Victor would have been telling people to mix their own 50/50 lube instead of trying to sell their own line of lube, so did it come from a dealership at the time as an alternative to an expensive name brand, or became popular during the depression amount folks too poor to buy electric gramophones or maintenance products for old fashioned machines?
Then again it may have come from early collector groups in the 60s or 70s who decided it's just vaseline and graphite in much the same way as some folks will tell you WD40 is nothing but kerosene in a can, without really knowing what the exact formula is because its used at a higher ration than the other ingredients.
I have absolutely no idea where the Vaso/graphite formula originated, but I would dearly love to see anything anyone has that could help educate us.
I don't know if Edison used a similar grease to Victor on some of their models, but I've never come across it before.
What I have come across is an original tube of Edison grease for Diamond Disc and Amberola machines.
It about a quarter of the size of a regular tube of toothpaste and the grease inside is a dark green colour with a "sparkle" through it, which is obviously graphite.
The tube recommend you add a whole tube to a DD barrel or half tube to an Amberola if spring noise appears.
So this stuff was designed to be added to old existing grease rather than a full spring cleaning and relube.
What ever this grease is, it doesn't solidify in the same way as Victor grease, and in fact it's quite common to find DD machines even today that run perfectly with the original 100 yr old grease in the spring.
I'm guessing the ones that don't may have been exposed to more severe temperature changes, or perhaps were just used far more than the average machine, but I really don't know.
What I do know is it's extremely rare to find an original HMV that doesn't bump but fairly rare to find a DD that does.
*I actually found your statement about hard chunks of graphite in cavities leaving just the oil behind hard to believe and I have to ask, how do you know this?
It's certainly been nothing like what I've experienced over 40 yrs doing dozens of motors, and until two weeks ago you didn't even know you need more than a teaspoon of grease to stop springs bumping.
I mean yes, graphite grease will be in the barrel cavities etc, but no more than any other grease would, except it's dries up, Most of the remaining graphite grease in the barrel will also be hard, particularly where the grease may have been trapped in the same place for perhaps decades without use, while some grease toward the inner coils haven't dries quite as much due to being move about more with use and holding its moisture better in a greater volume. Maybe?
But I have never come across a situation as you've described
I also have to ask why you would recommend using a grease gun to screw into the plug hole in an Edison barrel when adding grease to the spring.
It is completely unnecessary.
With the spring fully wound as instructed, the plug is removed, and the hole is positioned so there is a huge cavity between the barrel and spring.
The original grease tube has tip around half an inch long, similar to those used on some eye ointments,, and you simply insert that tip in the hole and squeeze the tube to deliver the desired amount.
There's no pressure or resistance from within the barrel making it necessary to force grease into the barrel like you'd need to force grease into a grease nipple..
I also wouldn't recommend adding a modern synthetic grease to old grease in a barrel. I think that probably would have a greater chance of causing seperation issues in the barrel due to using completely different formula to make them, so perhaps one of the old fashioned non synthetic grease would be a safer choice with a better chance of blending together.
I'm sorry if this all seems harsh, and it's not my intention to embarrass or anger you, but I do feel we all need to be careful about giving fellow collectors advise about things we don't really know about or have very limited experience iwith.
There's so much information about anything you can think of on the internet today that's good, but bad or conflicting info is also common place, so the less of the latter two there is, the better off we all are.