Clark-Johnson

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Post Reply
User avatar
pappde
Victor O
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:36 pm

Clark-Johnson

Post by pappde »

Do all Clark-Johnson soundboxes have a patent date stamped on the back side?
What about soundboxes on machine sold in Europe?
Is the lack of any markings on the back indication that the paticular soundbox is a reproduction?
Attachments
Clark-Johnson soundbox sold by the Gramophone Company
Clark-Johnson soundbox sold by the Gramophone Company
style25z2508.jpg (38.11 KiB) Viewed 1308 times
Clark-Johnson sondbox sold by the National Gramophone Company in the US
Clark-Johnson sondbox sold by the National Gramophone Company in the US
R-275%20Clark%20Johnson%20Reproducer%20Berliner%20005.jpg (187.55 KiB) Viewed 1308 times

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: Clark-Johnson

Post by gramophone78 »

I have never seen a unmarked "J". However, even repro's can be marked on the reverse. Some better than others. The two you show appear to be original. One is for the US market and the top one is for the UK & European market.
I have seen and own two variations that were for the US market.
J Reproducers (2).JPG

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: Clark-Johnson

Post by gramophone78 »

I thought this thread was a great opportunity to add a very important piece of information regarding these Clark-Johnson reproducers. As many of us know, a Berliner trade-mark was reproduced in Japan in the late 1970's. To avoid the unscrupulous sale of parts from these machines, the makers has the foresight to stamp all the reproducers with the same serial number.
As time has passed these machines are now showing age. As expected.....parts off these machines are now on the market and being passed off as originals. Therefore if you see a "J" reproducer with number 18425 you know it's not old at all. Please note.....the one pictured is missing the needle screw.
Repro J Reproducer.JPG
Repro J Reproducer (2).JPG
Repro J Reproducer (3).JPG

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8005
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Clark-Johnson

Post by phonogfp »

gramophone78 wrote:Therefore if you see a "J" reproducer with number 18425 you know it's not old at all.
But there might one legitimate original with that number! :lol: :lol: :lol:

George P.

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: Clark-Johnson

Post by gramophone78 »

phonogfp wrote:
gramophone78 wrote:Therefore if you see a "J" reproducer with number 18425 you know it's not old at all.
But there might one legitimate original with that number! :lol: :lol: :lol:

George P.
That's true. However, the odds would be 18424 to 1..... :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
Andersun
Victor III
Posts: 874
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:38 am
Location: Oldsmar, Fl
Contact:

Re: Clark-Johnson

Post by Andersun »

"Standard No.16464 and No.16464 both left the factory about January 1900. They were really cranking them out at that point.

George P."

I bet George will tell you that the odds are 16464 to 1...... :lol:

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8005
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Clark-Johnson

Post by phonogfp »

Andersun wrote:"Standard No.16464 and No.16464 both left the factory about January 1900. They were really cranking them out at that point.

George P."

I bet George will tell you that the odds are 16464 to 1...... :lol:
Okay - - I deserve that! :lol:

George P.

Post Reply