Unidentified Reproducer

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Post Reply
dutchman
Victor IV
Posts: 1228
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:14 pm

Unidentified Reproducer

Post by dutchman »

    This reproducer is off one of my machines I carried back from Calcutta, India in the mid-sixties. Was in use by a street vender who had a strap on it and a monkey in a costume, he would play a 78 and the monkey would run around the crowd with his cup for Rupees.

    Anyway cleaning up the collection - just sent 17 machines off to auction. I played this horned machine the reproducer is off of and noticed there is a small finely threaded screw in lieu of the thumb screw. I tried a thumb screw (spare) but no workie. Anyone recognize this thing and maybe I can get George V to come up with one. Thanks
    Attachments
    004.JPG
    004.JPG (81.46 KiB) Viewed 2373 times
    005.JPG
    005.JPG (78.32 KiB) Viewed 2373 times

    Phonofreak
    Victor VI
    Posts: 3720
    Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:00 pm
    Location: Western, WA State

    Re: Unidentified Reproducer

    Post by Phonofreak »

    This kind of looks like a late Columbia portable reproducer, because of the notes in front. I could be wrong. However, the notes look like the "Notes" trademark. Can you post a picture of the back to see the fitting?
    Harvey Kravitz

    Orthophonic
    Victor I
    Posts: 127
    Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:03 am

    Re: Unidentified Reproducer

    Post by Orthophonic »

    I have a Columbia portable with that type sound box on it so it looks like a Columbia. The musical note is their trademark.

    Phono48
    Victor IV
    Posts: 1325
    Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:38 pm
    Location: United Kingdom

    Re: Unidentified Reproducer

    Post by Phono48 »

    It's a Columbia No.23

    User avatar
    epigramophone
    Victor Monarch Special
    Posts: 5700
    Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:21 pm
    Personal Text: An analogue relic trapped in a digital world.
    Location: The Somerset Levels, UK.

    Re: Unidentified Reproducer

    Post by epigramophone »

    Phono48 wrote:It's a Columbia No.23
    In Columbia form it was catalogued as the No.24, but it was nothing more than a badge engineered version of the HMV No.23.

    These soundboxes were fitted to the cheaper HMV 87/88 and Columbia 205/211 portables of the EMI period. Good examples sound better than one might expect.

    Whoever forced that screw into the stylus bar probably stripped the original thread, so you may have problems fitting the correct replacement.

    dutchman
    Victor IV
    Posts: 1228
    Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:14 pm

    Re: Unidentified Reproducer

    Post by dutchman »

    Thanks for all the responses. There is fear in my heart that as EPIGRAMAPHONE stated the threads are no doubt stripped. Definitely sounds good tho. Cheers

    User avatar
    epigramophone
    Victor Monarch Special
    Posts: 5700
    Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:21 pm
    Personal Text: An analogue relic trapped in a digital world.
    Location: The Somerset Levels, UK.

    Re: Unidentified Reproducer

    Post by epigramophone »

    Unfortunately I have seen this sort of damage all too often. The original thumbscrew gets lost and anything conveniently to hand is, quite literally, pressed into service.

    Even worse is when the thumbscrew is overtightened and shears off, leaving the threaded end firmly embedded in the stylus bar....... :(

    dutchman
    Victor IV
    Posts: 1228
    Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:14 pm

    Re: Unidentified Reproducer

    Post by dutchman »

    Yes does not take much to mess up a reproducer. The Arentino I recently bought had a toothpick holding the needle - fortunately I bought a thumbscrew and it fit perfect. I do not have a micro tap and die set, knowing me I'd probably do more damage.... :(

    Phono48
    Victor IV
    Posts: 1325
    Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:38 pm
    Location: United Kingdom

    Re: Unidentified Reproducer

    Post by Phono48 »

    Phono48 wrote:It's a Columbia No.23
    Sorry, got my HMV and Columbia reference numbers mixed up! As stated it's a 24, the HMV version is the No.23. Thanks to epigramophone for the correction.

    Post Reply