
O/T Back to the Days of grainy polaroid photos of Phonos?
- Valecnik
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3868
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
- Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
- Location: Česká Republika
- Contact:
O/T Back to the Days of grainy polaroid photos of Phonos?
I can't help but noticing that more people are parking their pretty decent digital cameras and posting here and elsewhere poor quality blurry telephone camera pics in poor light when they offer something for sale. If the objective is really to sell the item, high resolution pictures from an at least average camera in good light would do a great service to the potential buyer and the seller as well. There. I've done it. My first rant of 2014. 

- Le0
- Victor II
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:28 pm
- Personal Text: avid 22 years old collector
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: O/T Back to the Days of grainy polaroid photos of Phonos
people use ther cell phone because it is linked to internet so it is quicker than uploading pictures in the computer and then posting the pictures.
Machines I own: Edison Standard A, suitcase Home, Home A, Triumph A & B, Columbia type BS, Standard Model A, Victor E, IV & V, Pathéphone No.4
- VintageTechnologies
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:09 pm
Re: O/T Back to the Days of grainy polaroid photos of Phonos
Valecnik,I totally agree. My theory is they are trying to hide the defects.
- alang
- VTLA
- Posts: 3116
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:36 am
- Personal Text: TMF Moderator
- Location: Delaware
Re: O/T Back to the Days of grainy polaroid photos of Phonos
Correct. That's why I insist that pictures of myself are only to be taken with cell phone cameras. No need to show the details.VintageTechnologies wrote:Valecnik,I totally agree. My theory is they are trying to hide the defects.

But in general I agree with Leo. I don't believe that most people try to deceive, they are just lazy. Even though I don't understand why anyone would think that bad pictures would help sell an expensive item.

Andreas
- Valecnik
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3868
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
- Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
- Location: Česká Republika
- Contact:
Re: O/T Back to the Days of grainy polaroid photos of Phonos
I also generally agree with Leo. I think in most cases they are just lazy, although I have been involved in some transaction where only after repeated requests for good pictures, the seller suddenly "notices" some previously unnoticed major defects after wasting a lot of my time.alang wrote:Correct. That's why I insist that pictures of myself are only to be taken with cell phone cameras. No need to show the details.VintageTechnologies wrote:Valecnik,I totally agree. My theory is they are trying to hide the defects.![]()
But in general I agree with Leo. I don't believe that most people try to deceive, they are just lazy. Even though I don't understand why anyone would think that bad pictures would help sell an expensive item.![]()
Andreas
I whole heartedly agree with Andreas that pictures of me are best taken with cellphones, at a distance, in dim light.

- epigramophone
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 5679
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:21 pm
- Personal Text: An analogue relic trapped in a digital world.
- Location: The Somerset Levels, UK.
Re: O/T Back to the Days of grainy polaroid photos of Phonos
Modern digital cameras are so easy to use that there is no excuse for poor pictures. You can view the picture as soon as you have taken it, and if it is not good enough you can try again. Once uploaded into the computer, all sorts of adjustments and improvements can be made.
I find the best results are obtained outside in good light, but not direct sunlight, against a plain background such as a white sheet.
If the machine is too heavy to manhandle out of doors, I still try to photograph against a plain background, and if possible without using flash.
Mobile phones rank high on my list of things which should never have been invented, but after a car crash some years ago I gave in to family pressure and got one. It is so old that it does not take pictures
.
I find the best results are obtained outside in good light, but not direct sunlight, against a plain background such as a white sheet.
If the machine is too heavy to manhandle out of doors, I still try to photograph against a plain background, and if possible without using flash.
Mobile phones rank high on my list of things which should never have been invented, but after a car crash some years ago I gave in to family pressure and got one. It is so old that it does not take pictures

-
- Victor I
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:15 pm
Re: O/T Back to the Days of grainy polaroid photos of Phonos
...and many of those photos accompany an add like this (faux) one:
- Valecnik
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3868
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
- Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
- Location: Česká Republika
- Contact:
Re: O/T Back to the Days of grainy polaroid photos of Phonos
"Victorla made by Edisen in excelent condition" This can't be realJoe_DS wrote:...and many of those photos accompany an add like this (faux) one:

- marcapra
- Victor V
- Posts: 2180
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 12:29 am
- Personal Text: Man who ride on tiger find it very difficult to dismount! Charlie Chan
- Location: Temecula, CA
Re: O/T Back to the Days of grainy polaroid photos of Phonos
I want that Edisen Victorla, but I can't tell if it's $15.00 or $15,000? I've never heard of an Edisen Victorla, so it must be rare. Love the pics. Looks like a cubist painting by Picasso. Not everyone who sells an old phonograph has any idea of what it is or what it's worth. This ad proves it.
-
- Victor I
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:15 pm
Re: O/T Back to the Days of grainy polaroid photos of Phonos
Oops, I made it look too real....marcapra wrote:I want that Edisen Victorla, but I can't tell if it's $15.00 or $15,000? I've never heard of an Edisen Victorla, so it must be rare. Love the pics. Looks like a cubist painting by Picasso. Not everyone who sells an old phonograph has any idea of what it is or what it's worth. This ad proves it.


No, it's completely faux, as I noted above, or imitation as in "faux marble."
Actually, while pure fiction, the add I put together is very close to some I've seen. I've spotted many overpriced "victorlas" for sale on Craigslist over the years, as well as some "Edisen" phonographs (and "phonografs.") And, there have been plenty of photographs like the one I made.
Whenever I do a comprehensive search on Craigslist and other "for sale" sites, I not only use every phonographic term I can think of -- gramophone, phonograph, "talking machine," "record player," turntable, etc. -- but every possible misspelling of those words.
JDS