For a while now I have been trying to determine why the record clamp on my Johnson type A #12295 is so badly discolored.
After all, the other "nickeled" parts are clean,shinny and gleam. We can rule out thinking the clamp came from another machine. This machine has never been altered in any way.
The puzzling part of all this.....there is not trace anywhere of ever having nickel applied. Even when examining under the felt.....nothing.
Using another comparable record clamp, you can not only see traces of a nickel finish, but also the gleam of nickel under the felt.
So, this leads me to think the record clamp in question was either oxidized (like the three main cast components), or was left in bare steel (yes, it is steel not brass).
I have looked at other Johnson A's and have noted the same "dull" finish on the record clamp.
Any thoughts on this please....?.
Regarding Record Clamps
-
gramophone78
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
- Location: Western Canada
Regarding Record Clamps
Last edited by gramophone78 on Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Dave D
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1315
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:43 pm
- Location: Port Huron, MI
Re: Regarding Record Clamps
It is probably from finger oils, etc.
Dave D
Dave D
-
Jerry B.
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 8741
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:25 am
- Personal Text: Stop for a visit when in Oregon.
- Location: Albany, Oregon
Re: Regarding Record Clamps
You would think that places easily touched would show wear and worn nickel plating but the color and finish are quite uniform. Jerry
-
gramophone78
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
- Location: Western Canada
Re: Regarding Record Clamps
Jerry has a valid point. The key in this case is....the hidden areas of the clamp have no sign of ever having a nickel finish. To plate an item, requires the "whole" part to be submerged.Jerry B. wrote:You would think that places easily touched would show wear and worn nickel plating but the color and finish are quite uniform. Jerry
If I was to take a guess (based on the color hidden).....it appears to be the same bronze hue as the three main cast parts.
I should mention, this is not just the Johnson marked type A models having this. Even the VTM marked type A machines have the same record clamp coloration.
Also "wear" can be seen on the brake lever. However, this is now just deeply tarnished brass. Remember the clamp is steel.
To me this whole issue seems odd, given the fact all other "small" parts are highly nickel finished...??. Very strange.
Last edited by gramophone78 on Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Zwebie
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:55 pm
- Personal Text: We are only the caretakers for future generations.
- Location: FLORIDA
Re: Regarding Record Clamps
I took a look at mine, it's on a highly original machine, (Victor Serial #12629), and believed to be original to this machine.
It is indeed steel, as a magnet sticks to it.
It appears to be oxidized, the same as the other metal parts, no sign of nickel.
I have included a picture.
Bob S.
It is indeed steel, as a magnet sticks to it.
It appears to be oxidized, the same as the other metal parts, no sign of nickel.
I have included a picture.
Bob S.
-
gramophone78
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
- Location: Western Canada
Re: Regarding Record Clamps
Thanks Bob, So, it would seem that sometime between 12295 & 12629 Johnson changed his data plate from ERJ to VTM. I would assume also sometime after the Oct. 1901 court ruling..??.Zwebie wrote:I took a look at mine, it's on a highly original machine, (Victor Serial #12629), and believed to be original to this machine.
It is indeed steel, as a magnet sticks to it.
It appears to be oxidized, the same as the other metal parts, no sign of nickel.
I have included a picture.
Bob S.
If these A's did indeed come with a special finished clamp.....how many past collectors changed theirs for a nicer nickel one as an improvement not knowing better....??