Jolly Coppersmith.

Discussions on Records, Recording, & Artists
Post Reply
User avatar
Phonoboy
Victor II
Posts: 380
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:04 am
Location: NE Oklahoma

Jolly Coppersmith.

Post by Phonoboy »

Brunswick record playing on my Victor VV90 using a rice paper and cork diaphragm.
https://youtu.be/55ilIu0aAIU
This machine surrounds hate and forces it to surrender-Pete Seeger.

Victrolacollector
Victor V
Posts: 2708
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;

Re: Jolly Coppersmith.

Post by Victrolacollector »

Wow! that actually sounds a lot better than the mica diaphragms. Maybe you are on to something here.

User avatar
Phonoboy
Victor II
Posts: 380
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:04 am
Location: NE Oklahoma

Re: Jolly Coppersmith.

Post by Phonoboy »

Victrolacollector wrote:Wow! that actually sounds a lot better than the mica diaphragms. Maybe you are on to something here.
Thanks.
This machine surrounds hate and forces it to surrender-Pete Seeger.

User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2759
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: Jolly Coppersmith.

Post by Wolfe »

Victrolacollector wrote:Wow! that actually sounds a lot better than the mica diaphragms. Maybe you are on to something here.
If it's so much better than why didn't the Victor engineers find it ? Not like rice paper and cork were foreign objects back then.

User avatar
Phonoboy
Victor II
Posts: 380
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:04 am
Location: NE Oklahoma

Re: Jolly Coppersmith.

Post by Phonoboy »

Wolfe wrote:
Victrolacollector wrote:Wow! that actually sounds a lot better than the mica diaphragms. Maybe you are on to something here.
If it's so much better than why didn't the Victor engineers find it ? Not like rice paper and cork were foreign objects back then.
Cost, patent rights, laziness, not thinking of it, the main reason I can come up with is because of the orientation of the sound box/reproducer. One can't show off their pretty labels if it's covered by paper,
Thoughts?
This machine surrounds hate and forces it to surrender-Pete Seeger.

User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2759
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: Jolly Coppersmith.

Post by Wolfe »

You haven't thought about it that much I can tell. Although a few of your points have merit.

User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2759
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: Jolly Coppersmith.

Post by Wolfe »

That setup seems to do a good job of mitigating surface noise ! But, non in-line video feeds can be deceptive.

User avatar
Phonoboy
Victor II
Posts: 380
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:04 am
Location: NE Oklahoma

Re: Jolly Coppersmith.

Post by Phonoboy »

You are correct, no I did not give the matter much thought, and would like to thank you for at least giving my point some merit.
I guess to fully appreciate the diaphragm I've made you would have to hear it in person. The idea behind mounting said diaphragm on the #2 was pure curiosity. You see, for some time now I've been developing a replacement for standard DD reproducers, so I had the materials on hand.
Much can, and has been discovered though experimentation.
This machine surrounds hate and forces it to surrender-Pete Seeger.

User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2759
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: Jolly Coppersmith.

Post by Wolfe »

Do carry on experimenting. I always find 'modern' methods of improving acoustic playback very interesting. As do a least a few others around here.

Post Reply