Brunswick record playing on my Victor VV90 using a rice paper and cork diaphragm.
https://youtu.be/55ilIu0aAIU
Jolly Coppersmith.
- Phonoboy
- Victor II
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:04 am
- Location: NE Oklahoma
Jolly Coppersmith.
This machine surrounds hate and forces it to surrender-Pete Seeger.
-
- Victor V
- Posts: 2708
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;
Re: Jolly Coppersmith.
Wow! that actually sounds a lot better than the mica diaphragms. Maybe you are on to something here.
- Phonoboy
- Victor II
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:04 am
- Location: NE Oklahoma
Re: Jolly Coppersmith.
Thanks.Victrolacollector wrote:Wow! that actually sounds a lot better than the mica diaphragms. Maybe you are on to something here.
This machine surrounds hate and forces it to surrender-Pete Seeger.
- Wolfe
- Victor V
- Posts: 2759
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm
Re: Jolly Coppersmith.
If it's so much better than why didn't the Victor engineers find it ? Not like rice paper and cork were foreign objects back then.Victrolacollector wrote:Wow! that actually sounds a lot better than the mica diaphragms. Maybe you are on to something here.
- Phonoboy
- Victor II
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:04 am
- Location: NE Oklahoma
Re: Jolly Coppersmith.
Cost, patent rights, laziness, not thinking of it, the main reason I can come up with is because of the orientation of the sound box/reproducer. One can't show off their pretty labels if it's covered by paper,Wolfe wrote:If it's so much better than why didn't the Victor engineers find it ? Not like rice paper and cork were foreign objects back then.Victrolacollector wrote:Wow! that actually sounds a lot better than the mica diaphragms. Maybe you are on to something here.
Thoughts?
This machine surrounds hate and forces it to surrender-Pete Seeger.
- Wolfe
- Victor V
- Posts: 2759
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm
Re: Jolly Coppersmith.
You haven't thought about it that much I can tell. Although a few of your points have merit.
- Wolfe
- Victor V
- Posts: 2759
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm
Re: Jolly Coppersmith.
That setup seems to do a good job of mitigating surface noise ! But, non in-line video feeds can be deceptive.
- Phonoboy
- Victor II
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:04 am
- Location: NE Oklahoma
Re: Jolly Coppersmith.
You are correct, no I did not give the matter much thought, and would like to thank you for at least giving my point some merit.
I guess to fully appreciate the diaphragm I've made you would have to hear it in person. The idea behind mounting said diaphragm on the #2 was pure curiosity. You see, for some time now I've been developing a replacement for standard DD reproducers, so I had the materials on hand.
Much can, and has been discovered though experimentation.
I guess to fully appreciate the diaphragm I've made you would have to hear it in person. The idea behind mounting said diaphragm on the #2 was pure curiosity. You see, for some time now I've been developing a replacement for standard DD reproducers, so I had the materials on hand.
Much can, and has been discovered though experimentation.
This machine surrounds hate and forces it to surrender-Pete Seeger.
- Wolfe
- Victor V
- Posts: 2759
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm
Re: Jolly Coppersmith.
Do carry on experimenting. I always find 'modern' methods of improving acoustic playback very interesting. As do a least a few others around here.