Most of us are familiar with the lower end machines such as the Edison Gem, Columbia B and the Q?
Which is your favorite "cheap" machine and why?
Best "Budget" Cylinder Machine
-
Victrolacollector
- Victor V
- Posts: 2711
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;
-
Victrolacollector
- Victor V
- Posts: 2711
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;
Re: Best "Budget" Cylinder Machine
I do not own and Gem and have not hear one.
I own a B and Q...and I would say the Q is my favorite, does what the B can do on a single spring. Depending on the reproducer, they can sound remarkable.
I have noticed that not all floating reproducers work well of on the B. It seems the B needs the reproducer with the stylus bar, in order to sit low enough on the record surface.
I own a B and Q...and I would say the Q is my favorite, does what the B can do on a single spring. Depending on the reproducer, they can sound remarkable.
I have noticed that not all floating reproducers work well of on the B. It seems the B needs the reproducer with the stylus bar, in order to sit low enough on the record surface.
-
HisMastersVoice
- Auxetophone
- Posts: 2587
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:01 am
Re: Best "Budget" Cylinder Machine
Definitely the B! It's my go-to machine for brown wax or if I want to quickly demonstrate any 2M record.
-
ambrola
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1502
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:20 am
- Personal Text: Be Careful What You Say, You Can't T ake It Back!
- Contact:
Re: Best "Budget" Cylinder Machine
GEM all the way. I have this one on the way. I like them first because it is an Edison. They don't take up a lot of room and you can interchange parts with them.
Just got this one.
Already had this one. I just love them.
Last edited by ambrola on Fri Nov 13, 2015 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
HisMastersVoice
- Auxetophone
- Posts: 2587
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:01 am
Re: Best "Budget" Cylinder Machine
My GEM is mostly a display piece as it's an early one with the GEM Speaker (which doesn't sound very good in my opinion). My opinion may be different if I had a later GEM with a model C reproducer.
- Valecnik
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3871
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
- Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
- Location: Česká Republika
- Contact:
Re: Best "Budget" Cylinder Machine
I would think a B or D model Standard or possibly an Amberola 30 or 50.
- epigramophone
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 5733
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:21 pm
- Personal Text: An analogue relic trapped in a digital world.
- Location: The Somerset Levels, UK.
Re: Best "Budget" Cylinder Machine
I owned an Amberola 30 for several years and it was totally trouble free. No belt to slip and none of the problems associated with wax cylinders. Anyone wanting their first cylinder machine need look no further.
I only sold the 30 when a nice early 50 (with external speed control) came my way. The advantages of the 50 are a slightly larger horn, a better quality cabinet (at least on the early versions) and a much better motor.
I only sold the 30 when a nice early 50 (with external speed control) came my way. The advantages of the 50 are a slightly larger horn, a better quality cabinet (at least on the early versions) and a much better motor.
- Valecnik
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3871
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
- Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
- Location: Česká Republika
- Contact:
Re: Best "Budget" Cylinder Machine
I agree re. the 30 vs. 50. There is not that much difference in price but the 50 is so much better because of the larger motor and horn. Only problem is no two min. ability...epigramophone wrote:I owned an Amberola 30 for several years and it was totally trouble free. No belt to slip and none of the problems associated with wax cylinders. Anyone wanting their first cylinder machine need look no further.
I only sold the 30 when a nice early 50 (with external speed control) came my way. The advantages of the 50 are a slightly larger horn, a better quality cabinet (at least on the early versions) and a much better motor.
-
Victrolacollector
- Victor V
- Posts: 2711
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;
Re: Best "Budget" Cylinder Machine
I do find them easy to demonstrate brown wax since my Home and Fireside do not have top mounted speed control.HisMastersVoice wrote:Definitely the B! It's my go-to machine for brown wax or if I want to quickly demonstrate any 2M record.
- Phono-Phan
- Victor V
- Posts: 2843
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:38 pm
- Location: Plover, WI
Re: Best "Budget" Cylinder Machine
I would have to vote for the Edison D Standard. They have great motors and can play 2 and 4 minute records.