I am searching for Victor 19671 record by Paul Whiteman and his Orchestra.
Side A : Honey Im in Love With You
Side B: Charleston
Must be in E condition or better. Thanks, Cliff
Wanted: Victor 19671 Record-Paul Whiteman & Orchestra
- hearsedriver
- Victor III
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:21 pm
- Location: Ft.Worth, Texas
- gramophone-georg
- Victor Monarch
- Posts: 4332
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
- Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
- Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA
Re: Wanted: Victor 19671 Record-Paul Whiteman & Orchestra
Cliff, that's a tough and expensive one to find in any condition. Thought for sure I had an extra but I don't.
I also wanted to let you know that is an early electric recording still on the batwing label. Don't know if you were aware of that or not. I am just pointing that out because you have a Victrola IV with an Exposition reproducer, which was never designed for electric recordings. If the gaskets and/ or back flange in/ on your reproducer are old/ hard, and if that reproducer is out of adjustment, you will wear out a very expensive and sought after record very fast.
Even with the Exposition 100% in order, you'll need to use a soft tone needle only,and you may still get some blasting due to the limitations of that reproducer. A Victrola #2 would be better, but a Victrola or HMV non pot metal No. 4 will really perk things up for electrical recordings, and it's just a question of exchanging reproducers- no modifications required.
Meanwhile, if you'd like a recording of the Charleston that's not electrically recorded look for a copy of Isham Jones' "The Original Charleston" on Brunswick 2970. The nice thing about this record is the flip side is "Sweet Man", another hot Charleston clone number- styled as a "Charleston Fox Trot" on the label. I may be wrong about it not being electric, I just reviewed it on my Dual 1009 and it has just a very slight hint of bass. It plays great on the Victor 5 with Exibition and the Vic 1 with Improved Concert reproducers, though, where the Whiteman one has so much "input" it blasts.
I also wanted to let you know that is an early electric recording still on the batwing label. Don't know if you were aware of that or not. I am just pointing that out because you have a Victrola IV with an Exposition reproducer, which was never designed for electric recordings. If the gaskets and/ or back flange in/ on your reproducer are old/ hard, and if that reproducer is out of adjustment, you will wear out a very expensive and sought after record very fast.
Even with the Exposition 100% in order, you'll need to use a soft tone needle only,and you may still get some blasting due to the limitations of that reproducer. A Victrola #2 would be better, but a Victrola or HMV non pot metal No. 4 will really perk things up for electrical recordings, and it's just a question of exchanging reproducers- no modifications required.
Meanwhile, if you'd like a recording of the Charleston that's not electrically recorded look for a copy of Isham Jones' "The Original Charleston" on Brunswick 2970. The nice thing about this record is the flip side is "Sweet Man", another hot Charleston clone number- styled as a "Charleston Fox Trot" on the label. I may be wrong about it not being electric, I just reviewed it on my Dual 1009 and it has just a very slight hint of bass. It plays great on the Victor 5 with Exibition and the Vic 1 with Improved Concert reproducers, though, where the Whiteman one has so much "input" it blasts.
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
- hearsedriver
- Victor III
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:21 pm
- Location: Ft.Worth, Texas
Re: Wanted: Victor 19671 Record-Paul Whiteman & Orchestra
Wow! Thank you for that thorough reply! I am a bit ignorant when it comes to the electrically vs. non-electrically recorded records. Generally, if it an expensive record, I use a bamboo needle, thinking that they are easier on the records. Is that a good way to approach playing the more modern recordings on my old IV or IX ? I figured I would have to pay up for the Whiteman recording of Charleston however, I am a fan of Whiteman. I will definitely look for the Brunswick recording though!
I have rebuilt the Exhibition reproducers on both of my machines and they seem to perform fine. I enjoy both of them. The IX is a really fine machine with surprisingly good tone. I like the simplicity (and weight) of the IV.
Again, thanks for your reply!
I have rebuilt the Exhibition reproducers on both of my machines and they seem to perform fine. I enjoy both of them. The IX is a really fine machine with surprisingly good tone. I like the simplicity (and weight) of the IV.
Again, thanks for your reply!
-
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3817
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Wanted: Victor 19671 Record-Paul Whiteman & Orchestra
There are no copies for sale on ebay at the moment, but recent sales are in the $35-%50 range, with a "mint minus" scroll copy over $150. Definitely not your typical 25 cent Salvation Army find!
- gramophone-georg
- Victor Monarch
- Posts: 4332
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
- Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
- Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA
Re: Wanted: Victor 19671 Record-Paul Whiteman & Orchestra
OK, good to know. Yes, the fiber needles will hide many sins, LOL, but doubtless one day you'll want to invest in a Victrola 4 soundbox or maybe an Orthophonic or viva tonal portable or tabletop.hearsedriver wrote:Wow! Thank you for that thorough reply! I am a bit ignorant when it comes to the electrically vs. non-electrically recorded records. Generally, if it an expensive record, I use a bamboo needle, thinking that they are easier on the records. Is that a good way to approach playing the more modern recordings on my old IV or IX ? I figured I would have to pay up for the Whiteman recording of Charleston however, I am a fan of Whiteman. I will definitely look for the Brunswick recording though!
I have rebuilt the Exhibition reproducers on both of my machines and they seem to perform fine. I enjoy both of them. The IX is a really fine machine with surprisingly good tone. I like the simplicity (and weight) of the IV.
Again, thanks for your reply!
I'm a huge Whiteman fan, too, not so much because of just Paul personally, but because I am a Tram and Bix fan, as well as a fan of the Dorseys, Teagarden, and Gershwin/ Grofe/ Seusse and the other great arrangers/ writers/ players that passed through this band.
It irks me when people dismiss Whiteman as "not jazz"... it's just foolishness. Even before the apex of the Tram/ Bix/ Bing era you have "Charleston" and "Whiteman Stomp", two of the hottest Jazz records out there. Even a lot of the huge band Columbia sides were Jazz trendsetters.
"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
- gramophone-georg
- Victor Monarch
- Posts: 4332
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:55 pm
- Personal Text: Northwest Of Normal
- Location: Eugene/ Springfield Oregon USA
Re: Wanted: Victor 19671 Record-Paul Whiteman & Orchestra
Interesting- I've never seen a later Scroll pressing. I have a mint Batwing Electric, and if my wife knew what I paid for it I'd be her ex.52089 wrote:There are no copies for sale on ebay at the moment, but recent sales are in the $35-%50 range, with a "mint minus" scroll copy over $150. Definitely not your typical 25 cent Salvation Army find!

"He who dies with the most shellac wins"- some nutty record geek
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
I got PTSD from Peter F's avatar
-
- Victor V
- Posts: 2710
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;
Re: Wanted: Victor 19671 Record-Paul Whiteman & Orchestra
That sure is a hard one to find, I have been collecting for 30 years! I have never seen this record in the wild. I have seen copies from time to time on ebay, which can fetch far more than a typical record, even the Diamond Disc version by the Golden Gate Orch. has fetched over $ 150.00.
I know the Vulcan cylinder company had a 4 minute cylinder copy at one time, however it does not appear on their site any longer.
I know the Vulcan cylinder company had a 4 minute cylinder copy at one time, however it does not appear on their site any longer.