Edison model L reproducer with trimmed weight

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
phonopal
Victor Jr
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 7:11 pm

Edison model L reproducer with trimmed weight

Post by phonopal »

Any chance that the trimmed weight on this model L was factory-made? Anyone else owns a similar model L with a trimmed or trowel weight? This one plays surprisingly well with plenty of volume.
Attachments
DSCF3338.JPG
DSCF3337.JPG

User avatar
MicaMonster
Victor III
Posts: 847
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:52 pm
Personal Text: Never Settled
Location: Rochester, NY
Contact:

Re: Edison model L reproducer with trimmed weight

Post by MicaMonster »

Yes ,that is a factory trimmed weight. It was found that the full round weight would damage the black wax 4-minute Amberol cylinders. Some were sent back for an update, others were made this way.

I don’t play black wax Amberols, but find that either trowel cut or full weight L sounds great on Blue Amberols.
-Antique Phonograph Reproducer Restorer-
http://www.EdisonDiamondDisc.com
Taming Orthophonics Daily!

phonopal
Victor Jr
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: Edison model L reproducer with trimmed weight

Post by phonopal »

MicaMonster wrote:Yes ,that is a factory trimmed weight. It was found that the full round weight would damage the black wax 4-minute Amberol cylinders. Some were sent back for an update, others were made this way.

I don’t play black wax Amberols, but find that either trowel cut or full weight L sounds great on Blue Amberols.
Thanks for the info! I'm still puzzled as to why they chose not to trim the hinged side of the weight like they did for the M's and O's. Also, while both George L. Frow and Rob Lomas have documented the existence of trowel weight M's and O's, neither of them mention the existence of trimmed or trowel weight L's.

gsphonos
Victor II
Posts: 423
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:33 pm

Re: Edison model L reproducer with trimmed weight

Post by gsphonos »

And what about a curved weight Model L? Ron Dethlefson had one, but I never examined it closely, and don't have a close up picture. Now I see that there are 3 varieties of the Model L, when I thought there were just 2.

Mike Sorter
Riverside, CA

User avatar
MicaMonster
Victor III
Posts: 847
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:52 pm
Personal Text: Never Settled
Location: Rochester, NY
Contact:

Re: Edison model L reproducer with trimmed weight

Post by MicaMonster »

The early one was a flattened H weight, essentially, called the “fishtail.”. Had one on Amberola ser# 2!


gsphonos wrote:And what about a curved weight Model L? Ron Dethlefson had one, but I never examined it closely, and don't have a close up picture. Now I see that there are 3 varieties of the Model L, when I thought there were just 2.

Mike Sorter
Riverside, CA
-Antique Phonograph Reproducer Restorer-
http://www.EdisonDiamondDisc.com
Taming Orthophonics Daily!

JerryVan
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 6597
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 pm
Location: Southeast MI

Re: Edison model L reproducer with trimmed weight

Post by JerryVan »

phonopal wrote:
MicaMonster wrote:Yes ,that is a factory trimmed weight. It was found that the full round weight would damage the black wax 4-minute Amberol cylinders. Some were sent back for an update, others were made this way.

I don’t play black wax Amberols, but find that either trowel cut or full weight L sounds great on Blue Amberols.
Thanks for the info! I'm still puzzled as to why they chose not to trim the hinged side of the weight like they did for the M's and O's. Also, while both George L. Frow and Rob Lomas have documented the existence of trowel weight M's and O's, neither of them mention the existence of trimmed or trowel weight L's.
Because trimming the hinged end would only take weight off the hinge, and not the stylus, which was the whole point of lightening the weight.

phonopal
Victor Jr
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: Edison model L reproducer with trimmed weight

Post by phonopal »

JerryVan wrote:
phonopal wrote:
MicaMonster wrote:Yes ,that is a factory trimmed weight. It was found that the full round weight would damage the black wax 4-minute Amberol cylinders. Some were sent back for an update, others were made this way.

I don’t play black wax Amberols, but find that either trowel cut or full weight L sounds great on Blue Amberols.
Thanks for the info! I'm still puzzled as to why they chose not to trim the hinged side of the weight like they did for the M's and O's. Also, while both George L. Frow and Rob Lomas have documented the existence of trowel weight M's and O's, neither of them mention the existence of trimmed or trowel weight L's.
Because trimming the hinged end would only take weight off the hinge, and not the stylus, which was the whole point of lightening the weight.
Makes sense, but does this mean that the common trowel weight design of the M's and O's with its trimmed hinged end has not been well designed after all? Then again, maybe that 2/4 minute rod that sticks out beyond the hinged end of the M's and O's ends up balancing things out…?

gsphonos
Victor II
Posts: 423
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:33 pm

Re: Edison model L reproducer with trimmed weight

Post by gsphonos »

MicaMonster wrote:The early one was a flattened H weight, essentially, called the “fishtail.”. Had one on Amberola ser# 2!

Ahhh…...that's the one! Thanks!
gsphonos wrote:And what about a curved weight Model L? Ron Dethlefson had one, but I never examined it closely, and don't have a close up picture. Now I see that there are 3 varieties of the Model L, when I thought there were just 2.

Mike Sorter
Riverside, CA

JerryVan
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 6597
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 pm
Location: Southeast MI

Re: Edison model L reproducer with trimmed weight

Post by JerryVan »

phonopal wrote:
JerryVan wrote:
MicaMonster wrote:Yes ,that is a factory trimmed weight. It was found that the full round weight would damage the black wax 4-minute Amberol cylinders. Some were sent back for an update, others were made this way.

I don’t play black wax Amberols, but find that either trowel cut or full weight L sounds great on Blue Amberols.
Thanks for the info! I'm still puzzled as to why they chose not to trim the hinged side of the weight like they did for the M's and O's. Also, while both George L. Frow and Rob Lomas have documented the existence of trowel weight M's and O's, neither of them mention the existence of trimmed or trowel weight L's.
Because trimming the hinged end would only take weight off the hinge, and not the stylus, which was the whole point of lightening the weight.
"Makes sense, but does this mean that the common trowel weight design of the M's and O's with its trimmed hinged end has not been well designed after all? Then again, maybe that 2/4 minute rod that sticks out beyond the hinged end of the M's and O's ends up balancing things out…?"

Don't know about the M's & O's, just going by MicaMonster's information about Edison wanting to lighten the load on the stylus. If that's the case, they got more lightening by doing what they did. Maybe the M & O strategy was meant for a different purpose, or maybe they didn't need as much weight reduction.

phonopal
Victor Jr
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: Edison model L reproducer with trimmed weight

Post by phonopal »

JerryVan, you might be onto something here. Maybe the trowel weight M & O ended up being designed this way as a compromise between reduced wear of the fragile Amberols and the proper playback of the 2 minute cylinders.

Still, the trowel weight appears to be way more commonly found than the trimmed L weight, partly due to the O's popularity I guess. While I've seen plenty of trowel weights out there, on both M's and O's, I simply haven't been able to find a single other example of a trimmed (more pear shaped than trowel shaped) L weight other than the one pictured above. This explains why I had somewhat questioned its 'authenticity' earlier.
Last edited by phonopal on Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply