Victor Presents: Paul Whiteman 78rpm Picture Disc!

Discussions on Records, Recording, & Artists
User avatar
JHolmesesq
Victor II
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 4:44 pm
Personal Text: Nashville nightingale, sing a little tune for me, croon for me...
Location: York, UK

Victor Presents: Paul Whiteman 78rpm Picture Disc!

Post by JHolmesesq »

Hey everyone,

I picked up my copy of this simply gorgeous 78rpm picture disc featuring many Paul Whiteman classics. I've uploaded this for you to enjoy - these usually sell for quite a lot so I consider myself very lucky to own a copy!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubOeYQqnras[/youtube]

User avatar
Swing Band Heaven
Victor III
Posts: 554
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:16 pm

Re: Victor Presents: Paul Whiteman 78rpm Picture Disc!

Post by Swing Band Heaven »

Great disk and a lovely find. Are these made of shellac? From the surface noise it sounds like it - but is it clear so that you can see the picture below?

S-B-H

User avatar
JHolmesesq
Victor II
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 4:44 pm
Personal Text: Nashville nightingale, sing a little tune for me, croon for me...
Location: York, UK

Re: Victor Presents: Paul Whiteman 78rpm Picture Disc!

Post by JHolmesesq »

I gave it a quick tap and it sounds like shellac, it certainly sounds like shellac - but it feels slightly flexible. I think it definitely is shellac. Weren't Victor experimenting with some kind of vinyl substitute around this time?

User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2759
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: Victor Presents: Paul Whiteman 78rpm Picture Disc!

Post by Wolfe »

Clear shellac? I doubt it.

It's probably similar to a Vogue picture disc, which were vinyl in composition.

If it's from the early 30's, Vitrolac is highly possible for this record. Vitrolac is basically vinyl, too, from what I know.

Edisone
Victor IV
Posts: 1140
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Can see Canada from Attic Window

Re: Victor Presents: Paul Whiteman 78rpm Picture Disc!

Post by Edisone »

Vinyl, yep. And it's spelled Victrolac in RCA literature. Dropping the 'c' was done by Modern Mechanix (and elsewhere), and that error repeated in The Fabulous Phonograph (and elsewhere).
Last edited by Edisone on Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:06 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2759
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: Victor Presents: Paul Whiteman 78rpm Picture Disc!

Post by Wolfe »

Edisone wrote:it's spelled Victrolac in RCA literature. Dropping the 'c' was done by Popular Mechanics, and that error repeated in From Tinfoil to Stereo.
Thank you. I am well aware of the alternate spellings, but never sure which one to settle on!

The Fabulous Phonograph (Gelatt) also uses Vitrolac as a term.

Edisone
Victor IV
Posts: 1140
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Can see Canada from Attic Window

Re: Victor Presents: Paul Whiteman 78rpm Picture Disc!

Post by Edisone »

oops - I just checked the PT pages in "From Tinfoil.." and it mentions only "a flexible plastic" ! So the 'Vitrolac' blame goes to Fabulous Phono!

User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2759
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: Victor Presents: Paul Whiteman 78rpm Picture Disc!

Post by Wolfe »

I don't imagine that Whiteman disc would have held up too well spinning it on the ol' Victor II.

I wonder if they issued with a disclaimer on the sleeve about playback requirements. Tracking pressure not to exceed 7 ounces. Or some such. :D

User avatar
JHolmesesq
Victor II
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 4:44 pm
Personal Text: Nashville nightingale, sing a little tune for me, croon for me...
Location: York, UK

Re: Victor Presents: Paul Whiteman 78rpm Picture Disc!

Post by JHolmesesq »

Haha, that disclaimer would be fun!

I'm intruiged by this "Victrolac" stuff. If my record is vinyl, why isn't it as flexible or lightweight as vinyl? Does anyone know exactly what it's made of? :)

User avatar
Wolfe
Victor V
Posts: 2759
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: Victor Presents: Paul Whiteman 78rpm Picture Disc!

Post by Wolfe »

JHolmesesq wrote: If my record is vinyl, why isn't it as flexible or lightweight as vinyl?
Vinyl doesn't have to be flexible, or lightweight. As a look at some heavy 1940's/50's long playing 33 ⅓ RPM discs can attest.

The Whiteman disc, being two layers of (likely thick) vinyl/vitrolac with a card or paper pressed in between has to reason to thin or lightweight either.

My Vogue picture discs are the same, thick, and probably close to as heavy as a regular 78.

Post Reply