Page 1 of 2
Why don't my clean early black cylinders sound very good?
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2022 8:30 pm
by eighteenbelow
I recently picked up a large lot of early Edison and Columbia black cylinders -- most are the kind that don't have any information embossed in the rim. They look very clean, and don't appear to have much wear, but they don't sound terribly clear; I have tried them on several different machines, too, including Edisons with C reproducers, and Columbias with floating reproducers. All the reproducers are good, so they're not the problem. The only thing I can add about the cylinders that may be useful to someone is that they seem, somehow, "soft," or "tacky," with a kind of cloudiness (definitely not mold, though; I am all too familiar with that, sadly) on the wax. You can see the difference between an unplayed section and a section you have just played; the latter is darker. Any theories?
Re: Why don't my clean early black cylinders sound very good?
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2022 8:45 pm
by JerryVan
The soft, tacky, cloudiness seems to indicate that your clean cylinders are not clean. Does the sound improve after multiple plays?
Re: Why don't my clean early black cylinders sound very good?
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2022 10:15 pm
by Roaring20s
Good clear photos may help us understand better.
James.
Re: Why don't my clean early black cylinders sound very good?
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2022 10:16 pm
by eighteenbelow
JerryVan wrote: Mon Jun 20, 2022 8:45 pm
Does the sound improve after multiple plays?
Yes, it does. Still not great, but noticeably better.
Re: Why don't my clean early black cylinders sound very good?
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:38 am
by howardpgh
Did you clean the stylus after playing the "cloudy" portions of the cylinder? Whatever it is, it's probably gunking up the stylus.
Re: Why don't my clean early black cylinders sound very good?
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 2:17 pm
by gramophoneshane
If you've been playing a lot of Indestructibles or other celluloid cylinders in the past, then the sapphire could be damaged.
Re: Why don't my clean early black cylinders sound very good?
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2022 8:14 pm
by eighteenbelow
Thanks, everyone. I do clean the stylus after each play, and the sound is equally bad on two different kinds of reproducers. I've attached three pictures of the same cylinder from the same angle, with different lighting; the dark areas, like the one up toward the top (or the right, as the photos are oriented before you click on them), is where the cylinder has been played recently. I hope this helps you all pinpoint the issue.
Re: Why don't my clean early black cylinders sound very good?
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2022 9:16 pm
by eighteenbelow
I just took out another cylinder that I hadn't played yet, and played the first half. These pictures show the contrast even better.
Re: Why don't my clean early black cylinders sound very good?
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2022 4:15 am
by AudioFeline
Have you thought of washing the cylinders to clear out any muck that might be at the bottom of the grooves (similar to washing dirty records)?
Re: Why don't my clean early black cylinders sound very good?
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2022 10:10 am
by Orchorsol
I freely admit that I'm a novice with cylinders and cylinder machines. However, I can't help worrying that this might be a damaged stylus, a possibility that someone has suggested in a post above. And that the changed visual appearance of the cylinders might be permanent damage. I have a cylinder phonograph which is doing a similar thing, and I won't use it again until I get the reproducer rebuilt or source one in good order. Is yours producing any dust as it plays, or fine particles on the cylinder surface? Even just a little? To my mind, that would make this hypothesis pretty much definite.