The Sound Comparison between HMV 202 and Two-Door Credenza

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Watanabehi
Victor II
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 3:13 pm

The Sound Comparison between HMV 202 and Two-Door Credenza

Post by Watanabehi »

Hello Re-entrant horn Lovers,

Here are two videos of comparing HMV 202 and Two-door Credenza sound. I used my hand-made susudake bamboo needle (same length) for both. The HMV 202 has its original oxidized silver soundbox and the Two-door Credenza has its original brass reproducer.

Hideki
Attachments
Two-door Credenza Bach Cello.MOV
(318.66 MiB) Downloaded 87 times
HMV 202 Bach Cello.MOV
(327.35 MiB) Downloaded 70 times

User avatar
Henry
Victor V
Posts: 2624
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:01 am
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania

Re: The Sound Comparison between HMV 202 and Two-Door Credenza

Post by Henry »

The 'cello sound on the Credenza definitely has more presence. I also feel that it is reproducing more evenly across the frequency spectrum. The bass response is outstanding. The HMV sounds to me somewhat distant and even muffled in some passages. Mind you, both machines are very impressive, but I prefer the Credenza for this recording. However, I believe that the real test for these Ortho machines is how they reproduce the full symphony orchestra, which is probably the most complex sound environment in the musical world.

Watanabehi
Victor II
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 3:13 pm

Re: The Sound Comparison between HMV 202 and Two-Door Credenza

Post by Watanabehi »

Henry wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 9:32 pm The 'cello sound on the Credenza definitely has more presence. I also feel that it is reproducing more evenly across the frequency spectrum. The bass response is outstanding. The HMV sounds to me somewhat distant and even muffled in some passages. Mind you, both machines are very impressive, but I prefer the Credenza for this recording. However, I believe that the real test for these Ortho machines is how they reproduce the full symphony orchestra, which is probably the most complex sound environment in the musical world.

Thank you for your comments. I will put up videos with full orchestra. Even with fiber (bamboo) needles they produce impressive sound.

Hideki

Watanabehi
Victor II
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 3:13 pm

Re: The Sound Comparison between HMV 202 and Two-Door Credenza

Post by Watanabehi »

Henry wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 9:32 pm The 'cello sound on the Credenza definitely has more presence. I also feel that it is reproducing more evenly across the frequency spectrum. The bass response is outstanding. The HMV sounds to me somewhat distant and even muffled in some passages. Mind you, both machines are very impressive, but I prefer the Credenza for this recording. However, I believe that the real test for these Ortho machines is how they reproduce the full symphony orchestra, which is probably the most complex sound environment in the musical world.
Here are the two videos of two-door Credenza and HMV 202 playing Willam Kappel and Khachaturian Piano Concerto. It starts with the piano solo and the orchestra joins to the end. I use an identical susudake bamboo needle to play it. If I use a steel needle, it is too loud. I hope you enjoy it.

Hideki
Attachments
two-door CredenzaMOV.MOV
(347.28 MiB) Downloaded 50 times
HMV 202.MOV
(347.59 MiB) Downloaded 45 times

User avatar
Henry
Victor V
Posts: 2624
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:01 am
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania

Re: The Sound Comparison between HMV 202 and Two-Door Credenza

Post by Henry »

To my ears, the 202 is brighter (it captures the high frequencies better) than the Credenza, with better separation of the orchestra and piano, although there is some shrillness (distortion) in the louder passages. On the Credenza, the orchestra sounds more distant and has a somewhat "tubby" quality. I prefer the immediacy of the 202, even with the overmodulation. I detect some wow (speed variation) in both, more noticeable on the Credenza, especially in the solo piano at the beginning. (Note: check the record for possible slightly off-center hole, which I thought I saw in the very brief view of the Credenza at needle drop.) Thanks for posting these examples!

Watanabehi
Victor II
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 3:13 pm

Re: The Sound Comparison between HMV 202 and Two-Door Credenza

Post by Watanabehi »

Henry wrote: Tue Nov 01, 2022 7:50 pm To my ears, the 202 is brighter (it captures the high frequencies better) than the Credenza, with better separation of the orchestra and piano, although there is some shrillness (distortion) in the louder passages. On the Credenza, the orchestra sounds more distant and has a somewhat "tubby" quality. I prefer the immediacy of the 202, even with the overmodulation. I detect some wow (speed variation) in both, more noticeable on the Credenza, especially in the solo piano at the beginning. (Note: check the record for possible slightly off-center hole, which I thought I saw in the very brief view of the Credenza at needle drop.) Thanks for posting these examples!
I have not detected any speed variation on Credenza and also the record is not off-center. I played the same record on HMV 202. So it shouldn't be any problem on speed. Thanks, anyway.

Hideki

Watanabehi
Victor II
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 3:13 pm

Re: The Sound Comparison between HMV 202 and Two-Door Credenza

Post by Watanabehi »

Watanabehi wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 7:55 pm Hello Re-entrant horn Lovers,

Here are two videos of comparing HMV 202 and Two-door Credenza sound. I used my hand-made susudake bamboo needle (same length) for both. The HMV 202 has its original oxidized silver soundbox and the Two-door Credenza has its original brass reproducer.

Hideki
I put up those videos on youtube, since some of you can not access to these video.

https://youtu.be/OJsQP3DQ-VY HMV 202 playing bach cello
https://youtu.be/AzNGbGsfvqw Two-door Credenza playing bach cello

User avatar
Inigo
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4453
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:51 am
Personal Text: Keep'em well oiled
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Re: The Sound Comparison between HMV 202 and Two-Door Credenza

Post by Inigo »

Marvelous videos, thanks!
Inigo

Watanabehi
Victor II
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 3:13 pm

Re: The Sound Comparison between HMV 202 and Two-Door Credenza

Post by Watanabehi »

Watanabehi wrote: Tue Nov 01, 2022 5:38 pm
Henry wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 9:32 pm The 'cello sound on the Credenza definitely has more presence. I also feel that it is reproducing more evenly across the frequency spectrum. The bass response is outstanding. The HMV sounds to me somewhat distant and even muffled in some passages. Mind you, both machines are very impressive, but I prefer the Credenza for this recording. However, I believe that the real test for these Ortho machines is how they reproduce the full symphony orchestra, which is probably the most complex sound environment in the musical world.
Here are the two videos of two-door Credenza and HMV 202 playing Willam Kappel and Khachaturian Piano Concerto. It starts with the piano solo and the orchestra joins to the end. I use an identical susudake bamboo needle to play it. If I use a steel needle, it is too loud. I hope you enjoy it.

Hideki
Here are youtube version of two videos on the same comparison.

https://youtu.be/dTC32tOWFFw Two-door Credenza
https://youtu.be/d_AKvLfatJw HMV202 Gramophone

anchorman
Victor II
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: The Sound Comparison between HMV 202 and Two-Door Credenza

Post by anchorman »

did you use the same soundbox in both videos? It's astounding the difference a soundbox can make. I've made up an adapter so that I can play Columbia number 9 on my HMV 102 portable, and it sounds very much like the number 9 on the 112a.

I think I prefer the 202, the motor seems to be smoother? slightly brighter sound too.

Post Reply