Diamond Disc vs Needle-type takes
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2024 5:37 pm
The following is only my anecdotal information. Someone with more knowledge than I have is welcome to correct these observations.
While the literature maintains that the Edison lateral cut "Needle-type" takes were recorded simultaneously with the vertical cut Diamond Discs, I find it hard to confirm with takes on both formats (see a possible reason in the next paragraph). I can, however, state that it appears that the take letters on the two formats are NOT the same take. That is to say, take "B" on the Diamond Disc will most likely NOT be the same take as "B" on the needle-type. One example is Birmingham Bertha, B.A. Rolfe with Vaugn DeLeath vocals. I can confirm that the Diamond Disc (matrix 19219-B) is NOT the same as take B on the needle type (N923-B). Granted, observing variations of takes is much easier with vocals or those selections with a few "free-form" improvisational bars (common on Edison takes) as opposed to straight orchestra-only selections without any brief improv section.
Muddying this observation, it seems that only ONE take (out of three) of an Electric Diamond Disc was usually ever issued. However, most of the time two or even all of the three takes of the same session on lateral "needle-type" discs were issued for sale. I presume that the lateral and vertical takes WERE recorded at the same time, as one could not expect (and pay) musicians used to the usual Edison procedure of three takes of a selection on any one date to suddenly perform SIX. However, it's a mystery as to why the take letters do not necessarily appear to refer to the same take on both formats.
I find these particular minutiae fascinating and would research it further if I could, other than direct observation. Any theories or input would kindly be appreciated.
While the literature maintains that the Edison lateral cut "Needle-type" takes were recorded simultaneously with the vertical cut Diamond Discs, I find it hard to confirm with takes on both formats (see a possible reason in the next paragraph). I can, however, state that it appears that the take letters on the two formats are NOT the same take. That is to say, take "B" on the Diamond Disc will most likely NOT be the same take as "B" on the needle-type. One example is Birmingham Bertha, B.A. Rolfe with Vaugn DeLeath vocals. I can confirm that the Diamond Disc (matrix 19219-B) is NOT the same as take B on the needle type (N923-B). Granted, observing variations of takes is much easier with vocals or those selections with a few "free-form" improvisational bars (common on Edison takes) as opposed to straight orchestra-only selections without any brief improv section.
Muddying this observation, it seems that only ONE take (out of three) of an Electric Diamond Disc was usually ever issued. However, most of the time two or even all of the three takes of the same session on lateral "needle-type" discs were issued for sale. I presume that the lateral and vertical takes WERE recorded at the same time, as one could not expect (and pay) musicians used to the usual Edison procedure of three takes of a selection on any one date to suddenly perform SIX. However, it's a mystery as to why the take letters do not necessarily appear to refer to the same take on both formats.
I find these particular minutiae fascinating and would research it further if I could, other than direct observation. Any theories or input would kindly be appreciated.