Chipmunk sounding brown wax cylinders

Discussions on Records, Recording, & Artists
Post Reply
KCW
Victor II
Posts: 450
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:04 pm

Chipmunk sounding brown wax cylinders

Post by KCW »

I have a bunch of old brown wax cylinders. When I play them the sounds is extremely soft, but still audible. They are playing at normal speed, and yet still they sounds very fast and the singers sound like chipmunks. Were these cylinders meant to be played at a much slower speed? What era do these come from? I’ve seen these before and sellers will comment on them being different than other brown wax cylinders. I’d love to know more about these. I suspect they are pretty old cylinders! Thank in advance for any information!

edisonplayer
Victor IV
Posts: 1742
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:33 pm

Re: Chipmunk sounding brown wax cylinders

Post by edisonplayer »

These would date between 1890 to 1898.edisonplayer.

KCW
Victor II
Posts: 450
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:04 pm

Re: Chipmunk sounding brown wax cylinders

Post by KCW »

I figured they were older but it’s cool to know they were from 1890-1898. Are they intended to be played as a much slower speed? How many RPMs are they supposed to be played at?

User avatar
Lucius1958
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4021
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:17 am
Location: Where there's "hamburger ALL OVER the highway"...

Re: Chipmunk sounding brown wax cylinders

Post by Lucius1958 »

KCW wrote: Wed Sep 11, 2024 10:09 pm I figured they were older but it’s cool to know they were from 1890-1898. Are they intended to be played as a much slower speed? How many RPMs are they supposed to be played at?
I believe early brown waxes were generally recorded at around 120-125 rpm, at least for musical records (talking records could be recorded as slow as 80-90 rpm, iirc). Some late brown waxes were recorded at 144 rpm.
- Bill

JerryVan
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 6382
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:08 pm
Location: Southeast MI

Re: Chipmunk sounding brown wax cylinders

Post by JerryVan »

Does the content indicate that they may be home recordings? A home recording may have been done at a lower speed to increase recording time. Or, as suggested, they may be some very early recordings. Can you post any pictures of the cylinders? Those here, who know more about it than I do, can usually date cylinders by appearance alone.

KCW
Victor II
Posts: 450
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:04 pm

Re: Chipmunk sounding brown wax cylinders

Post by KCW »

I don’t think it’s a home recording but I could be wrong. The song is “Tramp Tramp Tramp” which I believe is from the civil war. Attached are some photos. It’s a very quiet recording. I only paid 20$ for it. All the informstion is provided is very valuable and appreciated!
IMG_4812.jpeg
IMG_4811.jpeg
IMG_4810.jpeg

User avatar
ChesterCheetah18
Victor II
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:16 pm

Re: Chipmunk sounding brown wax cylinders

Post by ChesterCheetah18 »

Just my two cents. I only have a few, but every home recording I own is "very soft, but audible". One of them even sounds the way you describe when played at a "normal" speed. Have you tried playing them at a slower speed? My money's on them being home recordings.

Steve

User avatar
Lucius1958
Victor Monarch
Posts: 4021
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:17 am
Location: Where there's "hamburger ALL OVER the highway"...

Re: Chipmunk sounding brown wax cylinders

Post by Lucius1958 »

KCW wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 2:01 pm I don’t think it’s a home recording but I could be wrong. The song is “Tramp Tramp Tramp” which I believe is from the civil war. Attached are some photos. It’s a very quiet recording. I only paid 20$ for it. All the informstion is provided is very valuable and appreciated!IMG_4812.jpegIMG_4811.jpegIMG_4810.jpeg
Is there any announcement on it? If so, what does it say (if you can make it out)?
Recording companies in the 1890s often announced the brand (Columbia, Edison, etc.) to protect their product. No announcement, or one without a brand, might be either a home recording, or perhaps a pirate, pantographed copy, with the announcement omitted to forestall legal action...

KCW
Victor II
Posts: 450
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:04 pm

Re: Chipmunk sounding brown wax cylinders

Post by KCW »

The beginning of the recording is very soft but I don’t believe there is an announcement. I’d post a recording but it’s so soft one can barely hear it!

User avatar
drh
Victor IV
Posts: 1401
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 12:24 pm
Personal Text: A Pathé record...with care will live to speak to your grandchildren when they are as old as you are
Location: Silver Spring, MD

Re: Chipmunk sounding brown wax cylinders

Post by drh »

The 160 RPM standard for cylinders came later, when moulded records hit the market. The brown ones were generally (considerably) slower but not standardized.

Just in case you don't know, and apologies if you do: don't play brown wax cylinders with a Model C or later reproducer. Those were intended for the harder moulded cylinders. For brown wax, I think what you want is a Model B, or else an electronic option like what I mentioned in response to your related posting over in "machines." The relatively heavy floating weight of the later models (compared to that of a Model B) will cause undue, rapid wear to the older brown wax type.

Post Reply