WANTED: Reproducer for this unidentified Phonograph

Buy, sell, or trade your phonograph-related items here [except music]
User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8005
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: WANTED: Reproducer for this unidentified Phonograph

Post by phonogfp »

DGPros wrote: My information was taken from The compleat Talking Machine 5th edition page 140. It states.. "Model B and BX "Eagle" 1897-1906. For the first three years of production, this machine was known as the B in caseless form and the BX when enclosed in a bentwood cabinet.All later machines had cases and therefore have a "BX" patent plate."
There's no shame in being misinformed - - it has happened to all of us. This is a perfect illustration of an otherwise excellent work being marred by an inaccuracy. This definition of the "B" and "BX" simply isn't true, although it's an imaginative attempt to explain that darn "BX" designation. But for decades, unsuspecting readers will be misinformed. For years I have feared doing the same thing, which is why I keep asking myself when I write, "Do you have documentation for that?" It took me years to shake off some "facts" I had absorbed through early works such as From Tinfoil to Stereo, and I don't want to do the same thing to others. :)

George P.

US PHONO
Victor II
Posts: 307
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:34 am

Re: WANTED: Reproducer for this unidentified Phonograph

Post by US PHONO »

Could be a STYX or even Pathé, though the European market was full of makes that were essentially Graphophone B clones.

Have a look at www.noedison.com.

User avatar
DGPros
Victor III
Posts: 502
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:22 am
Personal Text: Gary
Location: Flemington NJ

Re: WANTED: Reproducer for this unidentified Phonograph

Post by DGPros »

phonogfp wrote:
DGPros wrote: My information was taken from The compleat Talking Machine 5th edition page 140. It states.. "Model B and BX "Eagle" 1897-1906. For the first three years of production, this machine was known as the B in caseless form and the BX when enclosed in a bentwood cabinet.All later machines had cases and therefore have a "BX" patent plate."
There's no shame in being misinformed - - it has happened to all of us. This is a perfect illustration of an otherwise excellent work being marred by an inaccuracy. This definition of the "B" and "BX" simply isn't true, although it's an imaginative attempt to explain that darn "BX" designation. But for decades, unsuspecting readers will be misinformed. For years I have feared doing the same thing, which is why I keep asking myself when I write, "Do you have documentation for that?" It took me years to shake off some "facts" I had absorbed through early works such as From Tinfoil to Stereo, and I don't want to do the same thing to others. :)

George P.
What's the saying? A little knowledge is a dangerous thing? Being relatively new (3-4 years) to this hobby, it can be daunting at times with so many machines and learning what parts go with what. This forum has been a great learning tool. Thanks for the correction
In short, is not liberty the freedom of every person to make full use of his faculties, so long as he does not harm other persons while doing so?
Frederic Bastiat

Post Reply