Columbia boxes

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Lenoirstreetguy
Victor IV
Posts: 1183
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:43 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Columbia boxes

Post by Lenoirstreetguy »

Since I had the camera out I took a picture of some Columbia boxes just for the heck of it. The one one the left is a brown wax box. I like the colours. The second one mentions Toronto in the long list of Columbia branch locations so I like that too :lol:
Jim.
Attachments
DSC03116.JPG

EdisonSquirrel
Victor II
Posts: 434
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:22 pm

Re: Columbia boxes

Post by EdisonSquirrel »

Columbia cylinders are a source of frustration for me. The 4-minute cylinders skip due to shrinkage, and the 2-minutes often sound so dreadful that I have to run--not walk-- to the phonograph to remove the cylinder.

We've discussed the problem with the 4-minutes, but we've never discussed the issue with the 2-minutes. They don't skip. The problem is that the sound will often waver in and out in such a manner that the result is plain terrible. There's nothing wrong with the reproducer; the Edison cylinders play fine.

:?:
:squirrel:

Rocky

gramophoneshane
Victor VI
Posts: 3463
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:21 pm

Re: Columbia boxes

Post by gramophoneshane »

Rocky,
I've never had that problem with 2 min indestructibles, so I'm guessing you must be playing yours with a sapphire stylus?

EdisonSquirrel
Victor II
Posts: 434
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:22 pm

Re: Columbia boxes

Post by EdisonSquirrel »

gramophoneshane wrote:Rocky,
I've never had that problem with 2 min indestructibles, so I'm guessing you must be playing yours with a sapphire stylus?
Yes. I'm referring to 2-minute Columbia wax cylinders played with a Model C reproducer.

Rocky

fonograph
Victor II
Posts: 434
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 7:14 pm

Re: Columbia boxes

Post by fonograph »

Trivia. If you look closely at the phonograph on the first box, the spelling is GraphAphone. ;) I'm not sure how this got past the Columbia QA folks??

User avatar
MordEth
Victor IV
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:01 pm
Personal Text: Contact me for TMF tech support.
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Re: Columbia boxes

Post by MordEth »

fonograph wrote:Trivia. If you look closely at the phonograph on the first box, the spelling is GraphAphone. ;) I'm not sure how this got past the Columbia QA folks??
If you click on the image to view it larger, in my opinion it appears to say ‘Graphophone’.

But the middle box has ‘Recor’ instead of ‘Record’ in the top line of text. Ooops. :D

— MordEth

Proudly supporting phonograph discussion boards, hosting phonograph sites and creating phonograph videos since 2007.
Need web hosting or web (or other graphic) design? Support MordEth by using BaseZen Consulting for all of your IT consulting needs.
Want more phonograph discussion? Be sure to visit The Online Edison Phonograph Discussion Board.

Aaron
Victor II
Posts: 353
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:08 pm
Location: Somewhere looking for a 9ft Brass Horn

Re: Columbia boxes

Post by Aaron »

MordEth wrote:
fonograph wrote:Trivia. If you look closely at the phonograph on the first box, the spelling is GraphAphone. ;) I'm not sure how this got past the Columbia QA folks??
If you click on the image to view it larger, in my opinion it appears to say ‘Graphophone’.

But the middle box has ‘Recor’ instead of ‘Record’ in the top line of text. Ooops. :D

— MordEth

I was actually going to bring this up but Fonograph beat me to it :) In many of the earlier boxes, "Graphophone is spelled Graphaphone. As you can see in my picture below. Thanks for bringing it up, Fonograph! I have often wondered how long this mistake was passed by, and what other mistake slipped through the system.

Aaron
Attachments
GraphAphone
GraphAphone
MVC-004S.JPG (38.41 KiB) Viewed 1541 times

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8043
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: Columbia boxes

Post by phonogfp »

I'd guess that about half the early Columbia boxes I've seen have the mispelled name, so evidently the mistake wasn't noticed for quite awhile!

George P.

User avatar
Valecnik
Victor VI
Posts: 3869
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
Location: Česká Republika
Contact:

Re: Columbia boxes

Post by Valecnik »

EdisonSquirrel wrote:
gramophoneshane wrote:Rocky,
I've never had that problem with 2 min indestructibles, so I'm guessing you must be playing yours with a sapphire stylus?
Yes. I'm referring to 2-minute Columbia wax cylinders played with a Model C reproducer.

Rocky
Rocky, I'm not sure what you are doing wrong. I play 2 min indestructibles and assuming the records are in good shape, they sound great. Could it be that the model C is not quite as responsive as it needs to be? Normally I'm playing mine with an O or an M.

gramophoneshane
Victor VI
Posts: 3463
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:21 pm

Re: Columbia boxes

Post by gramophoneshane »

I have a feeling that what's happening is the 2 min records are shrinking the same as the 4 mins, but not enough to make them ship a groove. I'd say that this shrinkage causes the groove walls to pull in closer, which means the sapphire rides up (is lifted by the walls) from the bottom of the groove, causing the wavering sound to occur.
I'm betting that if Rocky plays those same cylinders with a conical diamond stylus, the stylus will sit firmly in the bottom of the groove & they'll sound perfect.

Post Reply