Jim.
Columbia boxes
-
Lenoirstreetguy
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1183
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:43 pm
- Location: Toronto, Ontario
Columbia boxes
Since I had the camera out I took a picture of some Columbia boxes just for the heck of it. The one one the left is a brown wax box. I like the colours. The second one mentions Toronto in the long list of Columbia branch locations so I like that too
Jim.
Jim.
-
EdisonSquirrel
- Victor II
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:22 pm
Re: Columbia boxes
Columbia cylinders are a source of frustration for me. The 4-minute cylinders skip due to shrinkage, and the 2-minutes often sound so dreadful that I have to run--not walk-- to the phonograph to remove the cylinder.
We've discussed the problem with the 4-minutes, but we've never discussed the issue with the 2-minutes. They don't skip. The problem is that the sound will often waver in and out in such a manner that the result is plain terrible. There's nothing wrong with the reproducer; the Edison cylinders play fine.
Rocky
We've discussed the problem with the 4-minutes, but we've never discussed the issue with the 2-minutes. They don't skip. The problem is that the sound will often waver in and out in such a manner that the result is plain terrible. There's nothing wrong with the reproducer; the Edison cylinders play fine.
Rocky
-
gramophoneshane
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3463
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:21 pm
Re: Columbia boxes
Rocky,
I've never had that problem with 2 min indestructibles, so I'm guessing you must be playing yours with a sapphire stylus?
I've never had that problem with 2 min indestructibles, so I'm guessing you must be playing yours with a sapphire stylus?
-
EdisonSquirrel
- Victor II
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:22 pm
Re: Columbia boxes
Yes. I'm referring to 2-minute Columbia wax cylinders played with a Model C reproducer.gramophoneshane wrote:Rocky,
I've never had that problem with 2 min indestructibles, so I'm guessing you must be playing yours with a sapphire stylus?
Rocky
-
fonograph
- Victor II
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 7:14 pm
Re: Columbia boxes
Trivia. If you look closely at the phonograph on the first box, the spelling is GraphAphone.
I'm not sure how this got past the Columbia QA folks??
- MordEth
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1159
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:01 pm
- Personal Text: Contact me for TMF tech support.
- Location: Boston, MA
- Contact:
Re: Columbia boxes
If you click on the image to view it larger, in my opinion it appears to say ‘Graphophone’.fonograph wrote:Trivia. If you look closely at the phonograph on the first box, the spelling is GraphAphone.I'm not sure how this got past the Columbia QA folks??
But the middle box has ‘Recor’ instead of ‘Record’ in the top line of text. Ooops.
— MordEth
Proudly supporting phonograph discussion boards, hosting phonograph sites and creating phonograph videos since 2007.
Need web hosting or web (or other graphic) design? Support MordEth by using BaseZen Consulting for all of your IT consulting needs.
Want more phonograph discussion? Be sure to visit The Online Edison Phonograph Discussion Board.
Need web hosting or web (or other graphic) design? Support MordEth by using BaseZen Consulting for all of your IT consulting needs.
Want more phonograph discussion? Be sure to visit The Online Edison Phonograph Discussion Board.
-
Aaron
- Victor II
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:08 pm
- Location: Somewhere looking for a 9ft Brass Horn
Re: Columbia boxes
I was actually going to bring this up but Fonograph beat me to itMordEth wrote:If you click on the image to view it larger, in my opinion it appears to say ‘Graphophone’.fonograph wrote:Trivia. If you look closely at the phonograph on the first box, the spelling is GraphAphone.I'm not sure how this got past the Columbia QA folks??
But the middle box has ‘Recor’ instead of ‘Record’ in the top line of text. Ooops.
— MordEth
Aaron
- Attachments
-
- GraphAphone
- MVC-004S.JPG (38.41 KiB) Viewed 1605 times
- phonogfp
- Victor Monarch Special
- Posts: 8166
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
- Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
- Location: New York's Finger Lakes
Re: Columbia boxes
I'd guess that about half the early Columbia boxes I've seen have the mispelled name, so evidently the mistake wasn't noticed for quite awhile!
George P.
George P.
- Valecnik
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3871
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
- Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
- Location: Česká Republika
- Contact:
Re: Columbia boxes
Rocky, I'm not sure what you are doing wrong. I play 2 min indestructibles and assuming the records are in good shape, they sound great. Could it be that the model C is not quite as responsive as it needs to be? Normally I'm playing mine with an O or an M.EdisonSquirrel wrote:Yes. I'm referring to 2-minute Columbia wax cylinders played with a Model C reproducer.gramophoneshane wrote:Rocky,
I've never had that problem with 2 min indestructibles, so I'm guessing you must be playing yours with a sapphire stylus?
Rocky
-
gramophoneshane
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3463
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:21 pm
Re: Columbia boxes
I have a feeling that what's happening is the 2 min records are shrinking the same as the 4 mins, but not enough to make them ship a groove. I'd say that this shrinkage causes the groove walls to pull in closer, which means the sapphire rides up (is lifted by the walls) from the bottom of the groove, causing the wavering sound to occur.
I'm betting that if Rocky plays those same cylinders with a conical diamond stylus, the stylus will sit firmly in the bottom of the groove & they'll sound perfect.
I'm betting that if Rocky plays those same cylinders with a conical diamond stylus, the stylus will sit firmly in the bottom of the groove & they'll sound perfect.