Dave is right. ⅛" in 4" is 1:32. My problem has been that I recalled ⅛" per foot, which is the information from the later article and which had been picked upon by others and which is not borne out by measuring a machine. Edison's original letter makes it clear. 1:32 it is!
Thanks
Keith
Taper on Edison Cylinders
-
RefSeries
- Victor I
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 7:40 pm
- Location: Suffolk, UK
- Chuck
- Victor III
- Posts: 892
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:28 pm
- Personal Text: Richards Laboratories http://www.richardslaboratories.com producing high quality cylinder blanks
- Contact:
Re: Taper on Edison Cylinders
....and then when one starts measuring a bunch of
mandrels to get the actual results, one finds out that
it's more like 1 in 32.5 instead of 1 in 32.
So, we have some early indications of the ideal design
taper, and then we have the measurements of what actually
exists.
mandrels to get the actual results, one finds out that
it's more like 1 in 32.5 instead of 1 in 32.
So, we have some early indications of the ideal design
taper, and then we have the measurements of what actually
exists.
"Sustained success depends on searching
for, and gaining, fundamental understanding"
-Bell System Credo
for, and gaining, fundamental understanding"
-Bell System Credo