When Is A Victor 1 Not A Victor 1?

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Jerry B.
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8759
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:25 am
Personal Text: Stop for a visit when in Oregon.
Location: Albany, Oregon

When Is A Victor 1 Not A Victor 1?

Post by Jerry B. »

Maybe I should have titled this thread "What Is The Most Unusual Victor Rigid Arm Model? I've enjoyed the thread regarding the early Victor 3. It illustrates the difficulties when trying to date early Victor rear mount horn machines. I've always wanted a rigid arm Victor R. Is that the most unusual rigid arm model?

Jerry Blais

Jerry B.
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8759
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:25 am
Personal Text: Stop for a visit when in Oregon.
Location: Albany, Oregon

Re: When Is A Victor 1 Not A Victor 1?

Post by Jerry B. »

Didn't the advertising description "Victor The Third" come about when advertising came out promoting the Victor M with the, then new, rigid tone arm? Jerry B.

User avatar
Phono-Phan
Victor V
Posts: 2885
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:38 pm
Location: Plover, WI

Re: When Is A Victor 1 Not A Victor 1?

Post by Phono-Phan »

Jerry,
In all my years of collecting the Rigid Arm Victor R has been the most difficult to find among the four Rigid Arm models. I have seen early R machines with the "Remove This Plate To Attach Tapered Arm" But, I have never seen a tapered arm R. I would rank the rarity of the Rigid Arm machines as R being the hardest to find then the MS, M, and E.
Is it too early to start your Union Wish List?
Ken

phonohound
Victor III
Posts: 571
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:51 am

Re: When Is A Victor 1 Not A Victor 1?

Post by phonohound »

The Rigid-arm R is the most difficult of the rigid arm series to find. There is evidence in a 1903 Victor Catalog that actually shows the Rigid-arm Royal titled as the Victor 1. You can find a photo of this ad on page 62 of the Frabrizio Paul book titled Phonographica. Pictured is my all-original Victor R, including the horn paint, which to me is my favorite of the Rigid-arm series. You will see the serial number is 9684 and is labeled R.

Scott
Attachments
IMG_20190224_140959723.jpg
IMG_20190224_141048940.jpg
IMG_20190224_141110110.jpg
IMG_20190224_141102647.jpg
IMG_20190224_141034799.jpg

User avatar
alang
VTLA
Posts: 3116
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:36 am
Personal Text: TMF Moderator
Location: Delaware

Re: When Is A Victor 1 Not A Victor 1?

Post by alang »

That is a beautiful machine. I did not know that they also did the oxidized copper finish on the back bracket and the tonearm. Interesting that they did not use a plaque to cover the holes for the front mount arm.

Thanks for sharing pictures of this rare machine.
Andreas

phonohound
Victor III
Posts: 571
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 10:51 am

Re: When Is A Victor 1 Not A Victor 1?

Post by phonohound »

Thank you. It would have been nice if Victor made a small plaque or something to give it a more finished look. I like the R best because it is quite nice looking with a small footprint. You can pretty much display it anywhere :)

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8267
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: When Is A Victor 1 Not A Victor 1?

Post by phonogfp »

I've seen a couple early Royals/Victor Is with little decals on the front like this one:

George P.
From "Discovering Antique Phonographs" by Fabrizio & Paul.  All Rights Reserved.
From "Discovering Antique Phonographs" by Fabrizio & Paul. All Rights Reserved.

Jerry B.
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8759
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:25 am
Personal Text: Stop for a visit when in Oregon.
Location: Albany, Oregon

Re: When Is A Victor 1 Not A Victor 1?

Post by Jerry B. »

There is evidence in a 1903 Victor Catalog that actually shows the Rigid-arm Royal titled as the Victor 1.
Thanks, I remember seeing that page copied and used in a reply to a thread on our Forum. I too have always thought the rigid Arm R was the most elusive of the four rigid arm models. So has anyone seen an actual rigid arm machine with a Victor 1 ID tag? Is it simply Victor advertising that tagged the rigid arm R as a "Victor the First" which was shortened to Victor 1? Was the same true for other machines with the rigid arm? Was a Victor M with rigid arm called a Victor the Third or Victor 3?

Jerry Blais

Jerry B.
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8759
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:25 am
Personal Text: Stop for a visit when in Oregon.
Location: Albany, Oregon

Re: When Is A Victor 1 Not A Victor 1?

Post by Jerry B. »

George, do you think the Victor Rs with the decal were made for the US market? Weren't rigid arm machines sold for quite a bit longer in European markets? Was Victor just selling recently obsolete models anywhere but US markets?

Jerry B.

User avatar
phonogfp
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 8267
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:08 pm
Personal Text: "If you look for the bad in people expecting to find it, you surely will." - A. Lincoln
Location: New York's Finger Lakes

Re: When Is A Victor 1 Not A Victor 1?

Post by phonogfp »

Jerry B. wrote:George, do you think the Victor Rs with the decal were made for the US market? Weren't rigid arm machines sold for quite a bit longer in European markets? Was Victor just selling recently obsolete models anywhere but US markets?

Jerry B.
I believe the decaled Victor Is were made for the US market. There were no HMV markings on them, and they were found here in the States.

George P.

Post Reply