Gramola (HMV)

Discussions on Talking Machines of British or European Manufacture
Post Reply
langleycello
Victor Jr
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu May 06, 2021 7:42 am

Gramola (HMV)

Post by langleycello »

Greetings,

I recently picked up an Australian HMV machine (Zealand) which appears to be quite similar in style to the Victrola viii - it has a ‘Gramola’ soundbox which looks identical to the ‘Exhibition’ but without the rubber isolator - the back is solid brass, inc the connector which is part of the rear assembly. Is this normal not having a rubber isolator? I wonder if I can optimise the contact to the arm somehow..?

The other thing is that the motor slows down to a halt when I use fibre needles but is fine for steel needles. The motor appears like it has been overhauled in recent years with plyable grease, although I haven’t checked the double spring internally… luckily there are many tutorials to assist here and I will aim to give it a full overall over summer, taking particular care not to lose the tiny ball bearings!

As the ‘Gramola’ soundbox is so heavy, I also wonder if a simple counterweight can be fashioned - especially in view of my desire to use fibre needs? What have others done in this circumstance?

Thanks for your thoughts :-)

Cheers,

Stephen
Attachments
IMG_3004.png
IMG_3005.png

User avatar
epigramophone
Victor Monarch Special
Posts: 5649
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:21 pm
Personal Text: An analogue relic trapped in a digital world.
Location: The Somerset Levels, UK.

Re: Gramola (HMV)

Post by epigramophone »

Gramola was a budget brand of The Gramophone Company and was built down to a price.
The all metal soundbox would have been cheaper to manufacture than the Exhibition.

User avatar
Marco Gilardetti
Victor IV
Posts: 1515
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:19 am
Personal Text: F. Depero, "Grammofono", 1923.
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Gramola (HMV)

Post by Marco Gilardetti »

langleycello wrote: Mon Oct 21, 2024 8:30 am As the ‘Gramola’ soundbox is so heavy, I also wonder if a simple counterweight can be fashioned - especially in view of my desire to use fibre needs? What have others done in this circumstance?
Regular users of thorn needles usually find that weight actually helps playing through a record. The point has been discussed a pair of times on the board, also recently here:
viewtopic.php?p=349267

langleycello
Victor Jr
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu May 06, 2021 7:42 am

Re: Gramola (HMV)

Post by langleycello »

Thanks to you both for points of clarification. Seems like the Gramola soundbox is a cheap knock-off the Exhibition, without the flexible rubber isolator - probably not great for records… Maybe I should concentrate on overhauling the motor as it struggles when I use fibre needles - they seem to last well on other machines however (when i harden them with wood hardener and the air dryer). Thanks again for your thoughts.

Hoodoo
Victor I
Posts: 174
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2021 4:35 pm

Re: Gramola (HMV)

Post by Hoodoo »

I do like the knurling on the face of the Gramola soundbox.

Oedipus
Victor II
Posts: 338
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:59 am

Re: Gramola (HMV)

Post by Oedipus »

I suspect the differences between the Gramola and Exhibition sound boxes was as much to do with branding as cost saving. The absence of the rubber back would make only a small saving, and that lovely knurling would add a bit to the cost. There was also a slight difference in the diameter of the tone-arm and the corresponding socket on the sound box, presumably to ensure that the two brands were not interchangeable!

Post Reply