Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down
- solophoneman
- Victor II
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:05 pm
Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down
This totally nuts. either you had two out of their minds bidders who really wanted this item or you had one nut who really wanted it no matter what the price and an unscrupulous shill for the Seller working his magic, to take advantage of the "out of control" spender ! You can buy a perfectly good repro at any of the major suppliers.
- kirtley2012
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:10 pm
- Personal Text: Buyer of broken things
- Location: North Shields, UK
- Contact:
Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down
and remember it is a non-essential part! a machine can work perfectly well without a hold down so for someone to spend that much on a non essential part is insain!
- penman
- Victor II
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:27 am
- Location: Arizona
Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down
I don't think the seller had a shill, he's a well known and honest phono dealer. More likely the second bidder knew who was bidding and decided to make them pay handsomely for the piece.
-
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
- Location: Western Canada
Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down
kirtley2012 wrote:and remember it is a non-essential part! a machine can work perfectly well without a hold down so for someone to spend that much on a non essential part is insain!
I beg to differ. The part is very essential. Without that part the record will just sit as the table rotates under it from the weight of the reproducer, arm and horn assembly.
-
- Auxetophone
- Posts: 2587
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:01 am
Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down
The later ones didn't come with hold-downs, and they work fine. Is there a difference between the two types?gramophone78 wrote:kirtley2012 wrote:and remember it is a non-essential part! a machine can work perfectly well without a hold down so for someone to spend that much on a non essential part is insain!
I beg to differ. The part is very essential. Without that part the record will just sit as the table rotates under it from the weight of the reproducer, arm and horn assembly.
- phonogal
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 4:29 pm
- Personal Text: Life's Short. Be Happy!
- Location: Beautiful Piney Woods, SE TX.
Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down
I have a Pre dog M and it plays just fine without a hold down and it has a threaded spindle so it must have originally had one.gramophone78 wrote:kirtley2012 wrote:and remember it is a non-essential part! a machine can work perfectly well without a hold down so for someone to spend that much on a non essential part is insain!
I beg to differ. The part is very essential. Without that part the record will just sit as the table rotates under it from the weight of the reproducer, arm and horn assembly.
-
- Auxetophone
- Posts: 2587
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:01 am
Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down
And for a mere $1000, you could have a replacement!phonogal wrote: I have a Pre dog M and it plays just fine without a hold down and it has a threaded spindle so it must have originally had one.
- Valecnik
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3868
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
- Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
- Location: Česká Republika
- Contact:
Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down
I really don't see the necessity of the hold down at all. I wonder if the just slightly earlier one sided records were more prone to slip or??? Still Victor kept the one sided operatics well into the teens, no hold downs, no significant differences in the design of the machine...
-
- Auxetophone
- Posts: 2587
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:01 am
Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down
I've played stacks and stacks of both 7" and 10" early single-sided discs on my Victor R (sans hold down) and never had an issue with slipping. There must have been a reason for the hold down, but it's not apparent to me.Valecnik wrote:I really don't see the necessity of the hold down at all. I wonder if the just slightly earlier one sided records were more prone to slip or??? Still Victor kept the one sided operatics well into the teens, no hold downs, no significant differences in the design of the machine...
- phonogal
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 4:29 pm
- Personal Text: Life's Short. Be Happy!
- Location: Beautiful Piney Woods, SE TX.
Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down
No thanks. I think I'll pass.Brandon wrote:And for a mere $1000, you could have a replacement!phonogal wrote: I have a Pre dog M and it plays just fine without a hold down and it has a threaded spindle so it must have originally had one.
