Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
User avatar
solophoneman
Victor II
Posts: 315
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:05 pm

Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down

Post by solophoneman »

This totally nuts. either you had two out of their minds bidders who really wanted this item or you had one nut who really wanted it no matter what the price and an unscrupulous shill for the Seller working his magic, to take advantage of the "out of control" spender ! You can buy a perfectly good repro at any of the major suppliers.

User avatar
kirtley2012
Victor IV
Posts: 1607
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:10 pm
Personal Text: Buyer of broken things
Location: North Shields, UK
Contact:

Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down

Post by kirtley2012 »

and remember it is a non-essential part! a machine can work perfectly well without a hold down so for someone to spend that much on a non essential part is insain!

User avatar
penman
Victor II
Posts: 271
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:27 am
Location: Arizona

Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down

Post by penman »

I don't think the seller had a shill, he's a well known and honest phono dealer. More likely the second bidder knew who was bidding and decided to make them pay handsomely for the piece.

gramophone78
Victor VI
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Western Canada

Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down

Post by gramophone78 »

kirtley2012 wrote:and remember it is a non-essential part! a machine can work perfectly well without a hold down so for someone to spend that much on a non essential part is insain!

I beg to differ. The part is very essential. Without that part the record will just sit as the table rotates under it from the weight of the reproducer, arm and horn assembly.

HisMastersVoice
Auxetophone
Posts: 2587
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:01 am

Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down

Post by HisMastersVoice »

gramophone78 wrote:
kirtley2012 wrote:and remember it is a non-essential part! a machine can work perfectly well without a hold down so for someone to spend that much on a non essential part is insain!

I beg to differ. The part is very essential. Without that part the record will just sit as the table rotates under it from the weight of the reproducer, arm and horn assembly.
The later ones didn't come with hold-downs, and they work fine. Is there a difference between the two types?

User avatar
phonogal
Victor IV
Posts: 1243
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 4:29 pm
Personal Text: Life's Short. Be Happy!
Location: Beautiful Piney Woods, SE TX.

Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down

Post by phonogal »

gramophone78 wrote:
kirtley2012 wrote:and remember it is a non-essential part! a machine can work perfectly well without a hold down so for someone to spend that much on a non essential part is insain!

I beg to differ. The part is very essential. Without that part the record will just sit as the table rotates under it from the weight of the reproducer, arm and horn assembly.
I have a Pre dog M and it plays just fine without a hold down and it has a threaded spindle so it must have originally had one.

HisMastersVoice
Auxetophone
Posts: 2587
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:01 am

Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down

Post by HisMastersVoice »

phonogal wrote: I have a Pre dog M and it plays just fine without a hold down and it has a threaded spindle so it must have originally had one.
And for a mere $1000, you could have a replacement!

User avatar
Valecnik
Victor VI
Posts: 3868
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
Location: Česká Republika
Contact:

Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down

Post by Valecnik »

I really don't see the necessity of the hold down at all. I wonder if the just slightly earlier one sided records were more prone to slip or??? Still Victor kept the one sided operatics well into the teens, no hold downs, no significant differences in the design of the machine...

HisMastersVoice
Auxetophone
Posts: 2587
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:01 am

Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down

Post by HisMastersVoice »

Valecnik wrote:I really don't see the necessity of the hold down at all. I wonder if the just slightly earlier one sided records were more prone to slip or??? Still Victor kept the one sided operatics well into the teens, no hold downs, no significant differences in the design of the machine...
I've played stacks and stacks of both 7" and 10" early single-sided discs on my Victor R (sans hold down) and never had an issue with slipping. There must have been a reason for the hold down, but it's not apparent to me.

User avatar
phonogal
Victor IV
Posts: 1243
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 4:29 pm
Personal Text: Life's Short. Be Happy!
Location: Beautiful Piney Woods, SE TX.

Re: Original Early Victor Phonograph Record Hold Down

Post by phonogal »

Brandon wrote:
phonogal wrote: I have a Pre dog M and it plays just fine without a hold down and it has a threaded spindle so it must have originally had one.
And for a mere $1000, you could have a replacement!
No thanks. I think I'll pass. :roll:

Post Reply