Anyone can identify this soundbox? Could it be a No.4 variant or is it a non-original soundbox. The machine is labelled "HMV 109".
Thanks!
Cheers,
António
Strange soundbox in an HMV 109
-
amrcg
- Victor I
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:42 pm
- kirtley2012
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1621
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 3:10 pm
- Personal Text: Buyer of broken things
- Location: North Shields, UK
- Contact:
Re: Strange soundbox in an HMV 109
that is just a un-named, off brand swiss made soundbox, very common but not very good generaly
-
amrcg
- Victor I
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:42 pm
Re: Strange soundbox in an HMV 109
What about this HMV 145? This cannot be a 5A soundbox, right? Or are there 5As like this?
- Attachments
-
- Screen shot 2012-05-16 at 2.03.00 AM.png (392.27 KiB) Viewed 1779 times
-
estott
- Victor Monarch
- Posts: 4176
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 4:23 pm
- Personal Text: I have good days...this might not be one of them
- Location: Albany NY
Re: Strange soundbox in an HMV 109
That is a plastic soundbox from a 1950's children's phonograph.
-
David Spanovich
- Victor II
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:13 pm
Re: Strange soundbox in an HMV 109
The HMV #4 Sound Box generally looked about the same throughout its production run -->

While the casing was eventually changed from brass to pot metal, all #4 sound boxes were equipped with mica diaphragms. There were no variations produced by the Gramophone Co, though the overall design was copied by other manufacturers.
As for the HMV 5a or 5b, the main difference involved the edge of the diaphragm, as you can see in these photos:
HMV 5A -->

HMV 5B -->

While the casing was eventually changed from brass to pot metal, all #4 sound boxes were equipped with mica diaphragms. There were no variations produced by the Gramophone Co, though the overall design was copied by other manufacturers.
As for the HMV 5a or 5b, the main difference involved the edge of the diaphragm, as you can see in these photos:
HMV 5A -->
HMV 5B -->
-
amrcg
- Victor I
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:42 pm
Re: Strange soundbox in an HMV 109
mmm... I cannot grasp the difference. Could you please re-post the pictures including red arrows pointing to the spots where the differences are to be observed? Thanks!David Spanovich wrote: As for the HMV 5a or 5b, the main difference involved the edge of the diaphragm, as you can see in these photos:
Regards,
António
-
David Spanovich
- Victor II
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:13 pm
Re: Strange soundbox in an HMV 109
Hi António:amrcg wrote:mmm... I cannot grasp the difference. Could you please re-post the pictures including red arrows pointing to the spots where the differences are to be observed? Thanks!David Spanovich wrote: As for the HMV 5a or 5b, the main difference involved the edge of the diaphragm, as you can see in these photos:
Regards,
António
If you look at the very edge of the diaphragms, you'll note that the way they are indented or "creased" is different. Here's what I mean:
Based on what I've been told, and have listened to, personally, there was no advantage opting for the V-shaped indentation, versus the earlier one.
Last edited by David Spanovich on Wed May 16, 2012 3:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Orthophonic
- Victor I
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 10:03 am
Re: Strange soundbox in an HMV 109
I have one exactly like the one in the first picture and it is a Songster.