At least your sheet looks better....
Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT
-
gramophone78
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
- Location: Western Canada
Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT
[quote="raphael"]Just got a similar one as part of a big collection:
At least your sheet looks better....
. Sorry Bruce. I wanted to beat Steve this time...
.
At least your sheet looks better....
- Raphael
- Victor IV
- Posts: 1586
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:44 am
- Location: Davie, FL
- Contact:
Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT
It's all in the cropping. My sheets are just as wrinkled!
- Brad
- Victor III
- Posts: 939
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:12 pm
- Personal Text: So many phonographs, so little money
- Location: The Garden State
Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT
Bruce, the sheets are not wrinkled, that is "Craftsman Plaid".
Why do we need signatures when we are on a first avatar basis?
- ImperialGuardsman
- Victor II
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:01 pm
- Personal Text: Nothing like blaring Caruso out of your college dorm window...
- Location: Oregon
Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT
Great machine! Could you make a video of it playing? How about a 6 inch columbia record. Being a new collector, I had never heard of a 6 inch cylinder before. Did they sell well or were they a development right at the end of the columbia cylinder line?
ImperialGuardsman
OTAPS (Oregon Territory Antique Phonograph Society) Member
~Also a member of Suscipe Domine and The High Road forums~
OTAPS (Oregon Territory Antique Phonograph Society) Member
~Also a member of Suscipe Domine and The High Road forums~
- Tinkerbell
- Victor III
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:01 pm
- Location: Somewhere over Never, Neverland
Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT
Then I guess one could say my husband has a lot of Craftsman Plaid shirts!Brad wrote:Bruce, the sheets are not wrinkled, that is "Craftsman Plaid".
- Tinkerbell
- Victor III
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:01 pm
- Location: Somewhere over Never, Neverland
Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT
Lovely machine, Bruce. Do you still have your website of your collection up?Valecnik wrote:Maker: Columbia
Model: BGT "New Sovereign"
Years: Introduced in 1907
Original Cost: $70 with nickel horn, $80 with Symphony Mahogany, $85 with Spruce
Case/Cabinet size:
Turntable/Mandrel Size: 6 ½ inch
Reproducer/Soundbox: #11 or #12 (not sure)
Motor: Quadruple Spring
Horn Dimensions: 21.5 inches long 21 inch diameter
Repro Parts: none
Current Value Mint:
Interesting Facts: see below
Favorite Characteristics: See Below
Two & four minute machine set up to play standard cylinders as well as the six inch Columbia cylinders. A row of oiling tubes accessible on the back side of the bedplate make it possible to oil the machine without lifting the top works up. The Symphony mahogany horn was available from 1909 as well as 2 & 4 minute gearing. Given that this one is identified as a "BGT" stamped on the side of the upper works and on the paper tag under the lid, it probably dates from 1909 or a bit later.
I've missed the Featured Phonographs...
-
gramophone78
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 9:42 am
- Location: Western Canada
Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT
Tinkerball wrote: I've missed the Featured Phonographs... 
Why don't you post one then??. I don't think you have....???
Why don't you post one then??. I don't think you have....???
- Valecnik
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3871
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
- Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
- Location: Česká Republika
- Contact:
Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT
I'd love to make a video of it playing but unfortunately I don't have this one with me in Europe. An additional problem is I only have one 6 inch Columbia record in poor condition. These machines were made pretty close to the the end of the Columbia line and are not easy to find. According to Howard Hazelcorn, only 44 - 75 survive. They sound good but a large carriage Triumph sounds better.gramophone78 wrote:I go through all the work to photograph and upload these pictures hoping to stimulate some intellectual discussion about the Columbia line and what do I get??? Nothing but sheet from you all!!!raphael wrote:Just got a similar one as part of a big collection:
At least your sheet looks better....![]()
. Sorry Bruce. I wanted to beat Steve this time...
![]()
.
![]()
ImperialGuardsman wrote:Great machine! Could you make a video of it playing? How about a 6 inch columbia record. Being a new collector, I had never heard of a 6 inch cylinder before. Did they sell well or were they a development right at the end of the columbia cylinder line?
Last edited by Valecnik on Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Valecnik
- Victor VI
- Posts: 3871
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:28 pm
- Personal Text: Edison Records - Close your eyes and see if the artist does not actually seem to be before you.
- Location: Česká Republika
- Contact:
Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT
Thanks Tink! Yes, the website is still up and is "new and improved" www.phonographcompany.com.Tinkerbell wrote: Lovely machine, Bruce. Do you still have your website of your collection up?
I've missed the Featured Phonographs...
Also, over the summer, I took at least a hundred additional pics, (many better pics of machines already viewable on the site plus pics of new machines) that I have yet to put up there, all on Craftsman plaid background btw! Also, although the majority of the machines exhibited there are mine, not all are. The main purpose of the site is not to exhibit my collection but rather to offer good quality detailed pics to the collector community.
- Tinkerbell
- Victor III
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:01 pm
- Location: Somewhere over Never, Neverland
Re: Featured Phonograph No. 89 - Columbia BGT
I might do that with my early (as in no model number) Brunswick, but the challenge is writing something up on a phonograph for which little historical information actually exists (other than what I was able to obtain from Mr. Wakeman).gramophone78 wrote: Tinkerball wrote: I've missed the Featured Phonographs...
Why don't you post one then??. I don't think you have....???
I, unfortunately, do not have an impressive or interesting collection compared with the majority of collectors. I have to live vicariously through the acquisitions of other collectors here on the forum.