


Raphael
Thanks Raphael, I have to say as a collector how surprised I am that many seem to not know these things about machines. Owning books and years of collecting I guess contribute to knowing certain things..????. Lets use the "Skinner" photo for example. The pitch control is in the back left (facing the machine) circled in red. Did anyone not notice the location of the one for sale currently??. It may be in the correct location. However, I would be looking over the serial number very closely to make sure it was correct. Now regarding the motor board and again using the "Skinner" example.....You can clearly see the blondish grain (I circled in red. No other wood is going to look like Circassian Walnut (exotic) regardless of how you stain or grain it. Woods that have even or plain grain...like Fir,Poplar,Spruce and Pine can be stained and grained to look like mahogany, cherry, etc.... The bottom line here is as I wrote. It's "buyer beware" and if you are going to pay the big $$$$. At least get what you are willing to pay for. Knowledge is king. Regarding why the motor board was changed. I would guess it was done at a time when you could not give the machine away. A non-collector would careless.raphael wrote:Here are 3 images I have in my files. The top one was sold a few months ago, but I have the other 2 here in my warehouse. The center one was sold through Berliner in Canada. The bottom one may the the same as the one FloridaClay is showing.
Raphael
Jerry, I'm not sure "if" you read this thread from the start. No one is discussing what Victor used as a secondary wood when constructing these machines (other than yourself). The discussion on this thread is whether or not the motor board in this particular machine as been changed at some point.Jerry B. wrote:I don't disagree that the motor board on the ebay XVI was originally used in a mahogany Victrola. The discussion centers around the question of Victor using woods other than walnut to make external parts visible on any walnut Victrola. I think they did so that makes the repair for that particular Victrola a minor one rather than waiting for a Circassian motor board to surface. Jerry
This is why I visit this site. All the knowledge you guys have, and I have been collecting, buying and selling for 20 years. I also don't care about secondary wood, as you don't see it anyway. As to the machine in question, I alerted the seller of the change, and to his honor, he added it. I personally would not want that machine unless it was a bargin price in the 1500.00 range. You have to take into the fact that the finish is dull, and not shinny like it should be. Wrong motor board = I don't want it! Still a nice machine, but some newbie is going to overpay.gramophone78 wrote:Jerry, I'm not sure "if" you read this thread from the start. No one is discussing what Victor used as a secondary wood when constructing these machines (other than yourself). The discussion on this thread is whether or not the motor board in this particular machine as been changed at some point.Jerry B. wrote:I don't disagree that the motor board on the ebay XVI was originally used in a mahogany Victrola. The discussion centers around the question of Victor using woods other than walnut to make external parts visible on any walnut Victrola. I think they did so that makes the repair for that particular Victrola a minor one rather than waiting for a Circassian motor board to surface. Jerry
I am of the opinion the motor board in this particular machine has been changed. I seems you are also of the same opinion.
To be frank.....who cares what the secondary wood is??.
I would like to add that I see the seller has now mentioned this in the ad. That is a very good thing to do. However, if I were selling this machine.....I would be wiping down that board and (if able) remove the table and take at least one good pic of how it looks and post it. This may in fact change my opinion as well as others. However, it may not. Given the one poor pic currently posted.....my opinion stands.