Did we miss the 100th Anniversary of the Diamond Disc?

Discussions on Talking Machines & Accessories
Lenoirstreetguy
Victor IV
Posts: 1183
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:43 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Did we miss the 100th Anniversary of the Diamond Disc?

Post by Lenoirstreetguy »

October of 1913 was the official introduction of the Diamond Disc line and I think we let it past without a celebration. :D The introduction was a gradual process over the course of the year so that they were truly ready for the official introduction in October. The company was probably still smarting over the Amberola I fiasco where they they had advertised heavily for the Xmas trade of 1909 and then found themselves in cabinet supplier hell with no machines to ship. Likewise the introduction of the Cygnet horn had embarrassed them in a similar way. So with the Disc I'm sure they were very careful to have their ducks in a row before the " official" date. The machines had been out of the bag for almost a year before October. Demonstrators of the first machines went out to the big jobbers as early as December of 1912. In January 1913 R. S. Williams here in Toronto essentially introduced the line at the opening of their new building on the 23rd of the month. By the summer of 1913 even the smaller Canadian dealers had at least samples to demonstrate and I'm sure they were being sold in the larger centres
So raise a glass to the Diamond Disc, for which I bear an inordinate amount of affection because my first machine was a C250. ( And no, I did not buy it new from R S Williams. :lol: )
Jim
Attachments
IMG_0001.jpg
IMG_0002.jpg

Phonofreak
Victor VI
Posts: 3720
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:00 pm
Location: Western, WA State

Re: Did we miss the 100th Anniversary of the Diamond Disc?

Post by Phonofreak »

Thank you for posting this, and bringing this to our attention. The scans of the catalogs were extremely helpful. I, too, will raise a toast to the 100th anniversary of the Diamond Disk.
Harvey Kravitz

User avatar
alang
VTLA
Posts: 3116
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:36 am
Personal Text: TMF Moderator
Location: Delaware

Re: Did we miss the 100th Anniversary of the Diamond Disc?

Post by alang »

Yes, thank you very much for posting. This is very interesting. I did not know that the A-150 was before the A-100. Would you be willing to also scan and post the rest of this booklet, or maybe the remaining pages relating to the announcement (3-4 and 14-17)? I would be very interested in reading the full announcement.

Cheers to the Diamond Disc :)
Thanks
Andreas

User avatar
Dave
Victor II
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 3:50 pm
Personal Text: Gramophonist
Location: KY.

Re: Did we miss the 100th Anniversary of the Diamond Disc?

Post by Dave »

Happy 100th Birthday Diamond Disc!...
Although You can be noisy at times you will always have the finest fidelity!

Edisone
Victor IV
Posts: 1140
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Can see Canada from Attic Window

Re: Did we miss the 100th Anniversary of the Diamond Disc?

Post by Edisone »

alang wrote:Yes, thank you very much for posting. This is very interesting. I did not know that the A-150 was before the A-100. Would you be willing to also scan and post the rest of this booklet, or maybe the remaining pages relating to the announcement (3-4 and 14-17)? I would be very interested in reading the full announcement.

Cheers to the Diamond Disc :)
Thanks
Andreas
Most (all?) of the Edison Phonograph Monthly is available at archive dot org ( https://archive.org/search.php?query=ed ... phonograph ) ... which I suppose kinda kills the value of my extra book set.

User avatar
alang
VTLA
Posts: 3116
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:36 am
Personal Text: TMF Moderator
Location: Delaware

Re: Did we miss the 100th Anniversary of the Diamond Disc?

Post by alang »

Edisone wrote: Most (all?) of the Edison Phonograph Monthly is available at archive dot org ( https://archive.org/search.php?query=ed ... phonograph ) ... which I suppose kinda kills the value of my extra book set.
Thank you. Found it. :)
Andreas

Victrolacollector
Victor V
Posts: 2711
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;

Re: Did we miss the 100th Anniversary of the Diamond Disc?

Post by Victrolacollector »

I would love to have a Edison B-60... Are they rare today?

Victrolacollector
Victor V
Posts: 2711
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: NW Indiana VV-IV;

Re: Did we miss the 100th Anniversary of the Diamond Disc?

Post by Victrolacollector »

I also raise a toast to the 100th Anniversary of the Edison Diamond Disc.
I concur, while many war era discs were noisy, many discs are enjoyed with great fidelity and life like tone.

Personally, I think Edison would have been in the business longer even with Victor and Columbia as competitors. Seems, that the "off-brand" machines killed the Edison with their ads of being three machines in one etc. Heinemann motors in locally made cabinets were particularly a big seller here in the Chicago area.

User avatar
edisonphonoworks
Victor IV
Posts: 1566
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 10:50 am
Personal Text: A new blank with authentic formula and spiral core!
Contact:

Re: Did we miss the 100th Anniversary of the Diamond Disc?

Post by edisonphonoworks »

Diamond discs are my favorite disc records, there is something magical about them,not anything sounds like them, although i prefere the sound of a direct recorded blue amberol to be superior.

Wagnerian
Victor II
Posts: 299
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 7:43 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Did we miss the 100th Anniversary of the Diamond Disc?

Post by Wagnerian »

edisonphonoworks wrote:Diamond discs are my favorite disc records, there is something magical about them,not anything sounds like them
I couldn't agree more. They are unique with a totally different sound from other disc records (or "plate records" as the Edison publicity used to sneer, prior to them making their own!)with an amazing fidelity - I just try an avoid the ones manufactured at the end of the Great War.

Happy 100th Birthday DDs

TW-W

Post Reply