kirtley2012 wrote:estott wrote:kirtley2012 wrote:thanks for the tip but a dictaphone could never go into my bedroom (too big and ugly) and i want to do 4 minute and 2 minute recordings so i can play them on any normal phonograph and if i want to, experiment with making molds to produce recorded and blank cylinders in quantity for myself and just for fun!
thanks anyways!
Alex
Regarding your idea of molding your own cylinders- DON'T. Shawn Bori has worked for years to reproduce the process and the material, and it has cost him an endless amount of effort- and money. Once you get a machine with a good shaver and a recorder that works just buy some cylinders from him- you will save yourself some grief. For example- were you planning to make your cylinders out of candle wax? You won't be able to get a good recording and chances are you will ruin your stylus trying to play one back. Stick to getting a good machine and good records first.
i am not taking buisness away from shawn borri, these will be for personal use and although i do know the recepie for brown wax cylinders i could not make them myself, what i would do is buy brown wax cylinders, record them then pour in something to make the mold or use another method then melt down broken black wax cylinders and use them for making new cylinders
i know shawn borri has worked for years developing his method so what is wrong with me spending years developing mine
Now, Kirtley, I was trying to explain the pitfalls of what you wish to attempt. The principal problem that you face is mechanical. I was assuming that you would eventually figure out a satisfactory composition for the record. You could if you wished even use salvaged black wax from broken or damaged cylinders, but that would still leave you with the problem of records which will not track, or will not release form the mold, due to groove shape.
Many years ago, when I was experimenting with this process, I developed a pretty fair indestructible record, made of styrene tubing, steam molded. The styrene shrank sufficiently so that it could USUALLY be removed form the mold without damage, despite the relatively deep grooves made by my cutter, which used a standard Edison sapphire, but the records would nonetheless not track, for with the coefficient of shrinkage of my material a master record recorded at 100 threads per inch produced a record cut at 105 or 106 grooves per inch, one which would not track properly with a standard reproducer. Now, had I continued to pursue this line of work, I should have been able to get a new feed-screw cut for the Triumph that I was at the time using as a recording lathe, but even in the early 1980's, in the machine-tool-rich city of Cleveland, Ohio, which was yet at the time home to a massive though dying machine tool industry, it was going to cost more than seven hundred dollars for a properly cut feed-screw and its associated half-nut. I cannot imagine what the cost would be today! With laser, plasma, and water-jet machining techniques it may be no more expensive, but this expense must be considered.
Read Henry Seymour's excellent book before you start. It covers in considerable detail most aspects of the production of cylinder and disc records, and was written by an acknowledged expert in the field. Why attempt to re-invent the wheel, when you can instead build on the shoulders of a giant?